Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1114394)	2/2/2019 11:13:44 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579975

Interesting. So visually, there seems to be more correlation between temp and CO2. However, even if we find a decent adjusted R-squared, I wonder about causality? Correlation doesn't mean causality, as you know. Also, these things are long lived phenomenon with super cycles measured in geological time. So I believe that even a 140 year timeline may not be enough to truly understand the long lived cycles the earth naturally goes into. Think of the Carboniferous era. The question that is more relevant to me is can humans survive the velocity of change? And if we can survive it, will it cost a lot of money to change our living habits and locations due to the climate change that comes with all fo this? Those are the most relevant questions to me.