SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bull RidaH who wrote (13322)1/19/1998 6:48:00 AM
From: William H Huebl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Hi David,

And I thought April would be the peak... maybe earlier...

Thanks for you analysis of the wave structure in today's markets...

And what WASN'T said may be of greater concern than what WAS!

Bill



To: Bull RidaH who wrote (13322)1/19/1998 11:17:00 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Respond to of 94695
 
Hi David,

Superb post, thank you for some excellent reading.

GZ



To: Bull RidaH who wrote (13322)1/19/1998 10:24:00 PM
From: William H Huebl  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 94695
 
David,

Went back and did some calculations... always a dangerous thing...

At least since 1995, measuring the moves to the LOWS... yields a fairly constant rate of 10% per 100 days on the DOW.

And you say it's about to GET BETTER THAN THAT????

Wow!

Bill



To: Bull RidaH who wrote (13322)1/20/1998 8:16:00 AM
From: Jon Matz  Respond to of 94695
 
Welcome David, please stick around and share some more and frequently. I looked at your profile and studied your "three" posts and concluded that while you may not be prescient your feedback has so far been profitable.

Does anyone care to establish for certain whether Bernie is currently Bullish or Bearish. There seems to be a discrepancy on this thread.

Message 3199028

Cheers, Jon



To: Bull RidaH who wrote (13322)1/20/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: Investor2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Very interesting post on Elliott wave analysis. My question: Why, in your analysis of waves from 1982 to the present, do you ignore the 1987 "crash," yet call "a couple of 10%+ declines" in 1994 the end of the first major wave?

Thanks,

I2