SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (1119312)2/21/2019 8:12:38 AM
From: ryanaka  Respond to of 1573433
 
maggotedbrain mindmolten you watch FauxNews too much



To: RetiredNow who wrote (1119312)2/21/2019 9:03:17 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573433
 
BOMBSHELL: Attorney General William Barr’s Son-In-Law Is Now A Trump Legal Adviser
Tyler McGaughey just left his Justice Department job for the White House.
02/19/2019 07:41 am ET Updated 2 days ago
By Amy Russo
huffpost.com
Newly confirmed Attorney General William Barr’s son-in-law just left his job in the Justice Department for a post in the White House counsel’s office, raising questions about a possible conflict of interest.

Tyler McGaughey, who is married to Barr’s youngest daughter, has duties in the new White House job that are unspecified, CNN reported. The counsel’s office “advises the President, the Executive Office of the President, and the White House staff on legal issues pertaining to the President and the White House,” the White House website says.

Walter Shaub, who directed the Office of Government Ethics under former President Barack Obama and left the post under President Donald Trump in 2017, told CNN the situation is “concerning.” It prompts “further questions about Barr’s independence,” he said.

Barr, who oversees special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian election interference, has suggested that the probe is politically biased against Trump.

Barr called Mueller’s actions “grossly irresponsible” and criticized an aspect of the investigation into Trump’s potential obstruction of justice as “fatally misconceived,” The Wall Street Journal reported in December.

Nevertheless, Barr said during his Senate confirmation that he considers Mueller a friend and a “straight shooter.”

Barr was sworn into office Thursday, replacing Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (1119312)2/21/2019 9:08:30 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573433
 
BOMBSHELL: KKK Racist Republican trumptard ‘Domestic Terrorist’ Coast Guard Lieutenant Plotted To Kill Democrats, Reporters
Prosecutors say Christopher Hasson stockpiled weapons and wrote about creating a white homeland through violence.
By Christopher Mathias, Jessica Schulberg, and Ryan J. Reilly
huffpost.com

U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICEFederal prosecutors say U.S. Coast Guard lieutenant Christopher Hasson stockpiled weapons as part of a plan to murder civilians.

A lieutenant in the U.S. Coast Guard is a domestic terrorist and a self-identified white nationalist who was stockpiling weapons to “murder innocent civilians on a scale rarely seen in this country,” federal prosecutors alleged in shocking court filings this week.

Christopher Paul Hasson was arrested on Feb. 15 on gun and drug charges. Four days later, federal prosecutors wrote in a motion to detain Hasson that those charges were just the “tip of the proverbial iceberg.”

“The defendant is a domestic terrorist,” federal prosecutors wrote in the court filing, “bent on committing acts dangerous to human life that are intended to affect governmental conduct.”

Hasson, a resident of Silver Spring, Maryland, was assigned at the U.S. Coast Guard headquarters in Washington, D.C.

According to prosecutors, Hasson wrote about establishing an ethno-state — a goal he acknowledged would require violence. “Liberalist/globalist ideology is destroying traditional peoples esp white. No way to counteract without violence,” Hasson wrote in a June 2017 draft email obtained by prosecutors. “Much blood will have to be spilled to get whitey off the couch,” he continued.

“I don’t know if there truly is a ‘conspiracy’ of ((((People)))) out to destroy me and mine, but there is an attack none the less,” Hasson wrote in the draft email, deploying parentheses around the word “people” to signify Jews.

Months later, Hasson sent himself a draft letter to an unnamed “American neo-Nazi leader.” He identified himself as a longtime white nationalist in favor of “focused violence” to establish a “white homeland,” prosecutors alleged in court filings. “We need a white homeland as Europe seems lost,” Hasson wrote in the letter. “How long we can hold out there and prevent niggerization of the Northwest until whites wake up on their own or are forcibly made to make a decision whether to roll over and die or to stand up remains to be seen.”

Hasson appears to have researched specific targets for his violent plans. After viewing a headline claiming that MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough described President Donald Trump as the “worst ever,” he searched “where is morning joe filmed.” He queried Google for “most liberal senators”; “where do most senators live in dc”; “do senators have ss [secret service] protection” and “are supreme court justices protected.” He also researched prominent left-leaning media figures and politicians, including Chris Hayes, Ari Melber, Don Lemon, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), former Rep. Beto O’Rourke and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.)

Prosecutors allege Hasson drew inspiration from mass murderer Anders Breivik, the Norwegian white supremacist who massacred 77 people in 2011.

“From early 2017 through the date of his arrest, the defendant routinely perused portions of [Breivik’s manifesto] that instruct a prospective assailant to amass appropriate firearms, food, disguises, and survival supplies,” prosecutors wrote. “Consistent with the Breivik manifesto, the defendant performed thousands of visits to websites selling firearms and tactical gear.”

Prosecutors say Hasson also researched U.S. military manuals on “improvised munitions.” When federal agents raided Hasson’s home earlier this month, they found “fifteen firearms and, conservatively, over 1,000 rounds of mixed ammunition,” prosecutors said. Although Hasson did not receive tactical, weapons, or explosives-related training in relation to his job with the Coast Guard, he served in the Marine Corps from 1988 to 1993, and spent two years in the Army National Guard.

Subscribe to the Politics email.
How will Trump's administration impact you?

It is not uncommon for white nationalists to seek weapons and combat training through the military. Last year ProPublica exposed an active-duty Marine as a white supremacist with ties to Atomwaffen Division, a secretive neo-Nazi group whose members fantasize about a race war in the U.S. Atomwaffen deliberately recruits U.S. military personnel because of their training and access to weapons, a former group member told law enforcement officials.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Gina Simms appointed a federal public defender for Hasson during his initial appearance on Feb. 15, but court records do not currently list an attorney assigned to his case. He’s due in court on Thursday afternoon.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland has not put out a press release on the case, which was first discovered by Seamus Hughes, a former counterterrorism official who now works with the Program on Extremism at George Washington University.

It is very unusual for federal prosecutors to label a defendant as a “domestic terrorist” ahead of their trial, as HuffPost has previously explained. There’s no federal law against domestic terrorism, which means that federal prosecutors take a different approach to terror cases without a connection to designated international terrorism group.

In this case, prosecutors deployed a drug possession charge and a rarely used statute that makes it illegal to possess a firearm while using or being addicted to a controlled substance. The latter charge is the same one the feds used against neo-Nazi Jeffrey Clark, a D.C. man who stockpiled weapons as he consorted with a number of white supremacists online and in person.

There are specific domestic terrorism charges that the federal government can bring when domestic extremists engage in very specific types of activity, such as targeting a train. But groups like the FBI Agents Association and some former government counterterrorism officials say that Congress needs to change the law so that there’s a specific statute making acts domestic terrorism a federal crime.

Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? Here’s how.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (1119312)2/21/2019 9:10:45 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573433
 
Better for the NY taxpayer idiots to give Amazon $3 billion welfare so that Amazon could lobby the corrupt politicians in congress to pass tax law loopholes to pay ZERO taxes while Bezos becomes a trillionaire and Amazon puts all the mom & pop small shops in NY out of business and thousands of those same tax payers to be out of work and be forced to work for Amazon for minimum wage. Sheesh....
observer.com



To: RetiredNow who wrote (1119312)2/21/2019 9:11:51 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573433
 
OOPS! Amazon Paid $0 in Federal Taxes Despite Making $11 Billion in 2018—And No One Knows Why
By Sissi Cao • 02/20/19 8:30am
observer.com
Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon. SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

You may feel like a champion financial planner after filing last year’s income taxes, even though you did pay a hefty fee to an accountant or some tax software. But don’t even think about beating Amazon, which paid a whopping $0 in federal taxes last year—despite earning $11.2 billion in U.S. profits—according to a report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) last week.

Even better (for Amazon), it actually claimed $129 million in federal income tax rebates in 2018. In percentage terms, that works out to an effective tax rate of -1.2 percent for the e-commerce giant, instead of the statutory 21 percent corporate income tax rate under the new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which took effect last year.

Subscribe to Observer’s Business Newsletter

“If you paid the $119 annual fee to become an Amazon Prime member, you paid more to Amazon than it paid in taxes,” Senator Bernie Sanders mocked the e-commerce giant in a tweet last Thursday.

Believe it or not, it was actually the second year in a row that Amazon managed to avoid any federal income tax. In 2017, the company also paid nothing on its $5.6 billion U.S. profits and claimed a tax return of $140 million. But the most upsetting and confusing part of all of this is probably the fact that no one—except Amazon’s own accountants, of course—seems to have a clue as to how Amazon was able to do that.

“It’s hard to know exactly what they’re doing,” Steve Wamhoff, ITEP’s director of federal tax policy, told Yahoo Finance. “In their public documents, they don’t lay out their tax strategy. So it’s unclear exactly which breaks [they are taking advantage of]. They vaguely say tax credits… The thing we would need to know is would they have had positive corporate income tax liability were it not for TCJA? Maybe. It’s hard to tell.”

In response to the ITEP report, Amazon said the tax credits applied in 2018’s filing included capital depreciation and research and development (R&D) investment credits. Tax break for employee stock options also played a big role in lowering its effective tax rate. In 2018, stock options were applied for employees of all levels, the company said, so the tax deduction from vested share values resulted in larger tax savings than previous years.

More specifically, a big chunk of the tax savings could come from what’s called the “bonus depreciation” under the TCJA, Paul Gevertzman, a tax partner at New York-based accounting firm Anchin, told Observer.



Bernie Sanders

?@SenSanders





If you paid the $119 annual fee to become an Amazon Prime member, you paid more to Amazon than it paid in taxes.

Our job: Repeal all of the Trump tax breaks for the top 1% and large corporations and demand that they pay their fair share in taxes.



FORTUNE

?@FortuneMagazine

Amazon will pay $0 in federal income taxes on $11.2 billion in profit.
bit.ly





29.2K

6:36 PM - Feb 14, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy



10.2K people are talking about this



Under the capital depreciation rule prior to the TCJA, companies were allowed to write off up to 50 percent on qualified expenses, such as equipment purchases or new facility construction, Gevertzman explained. The tax-exempt portion was 50 percent in 2017 and was scheduled to gradually phase out in 2018 and 2019. But last year’s tax reform overrode these schedules and allowed companies to write off 100 percent of qualified expenses in the first year.

Per Amazon’s own disclosure in its annual report, the company’s federal tax credits last year were “primarily related to the U.S. federal research and development credit.” Although R&D credits have been around long before the TCJA came along, a tax law change last year greatly affected how these tax credits could be used.

The TCJA eliminated the alternative minimum tax for corporations, a system in which companies were required to pay at least some amount of taxes—no matter how many tax breaks they were entitled to. For this reason, many companies would keep their R&D deductions off tax filings when they couldn’t reduce the final taxes below the alternative minimum tax.

But without this limit starting in 2018, companies were allowed to carry over previous years’ unused R&D credits for up to 20 years. “Amazon probably used the R&D credits that they had banked for years and years. That could be a huge number freed up because of the law changes last year,” Gevertzman said.

To be fair, that’s not to say that Amazon has never paid taxes. In fact, before 2017, the company paid federal income taxes fairly consistently. According a 2017 analysis by The New York Times, Amazon paid an average annual tax rate of 13 percent—covering federal, state, local and international—between 2007 and 2015. Still, that rate fell below the average rate of 26.9 percent among S&P 500 companies.

“Amazon pays all the taxes we are required to pay in the U.S. and every country where we operate, including paying $2.6 billion in corporate tax and reporting $3.4 billion in tax expense over the last three years,” an Amazon spokesperson said in a statement to Observer.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (1119312)2/21/2019 1:57:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu6 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Joe Btfsplk
locogringo
RetiredNow
Thomas A Watson

and 1 more member

  Read Replies (8) | Respond to of 1573433
 
Mindmeld, the supply of "hate crimes" isn't meeting demand, so the left has to fake them.

And you know there's PLENTY of demand, thanks to the libtards on this thread who suffer from "white guilt."

Tenchusatsu