Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1124471)	3/13/2019 8:19:50 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Respond to of 1578290

Dave_from_Florida TheoSentrik Get out in front? They were dragged kicking and screaming into grounding them. This is in my area of expertise and I believe the 737 Max has a design flaw that wasn't noted until long after they were well into production. Usually the center of gravity (CG) is near the main landing gear but if you look at the plane most of the weight especially those heavy engines is well forward of the landing gear. I believe Boeing after finding the error simply designed software for the onboard computer to compensate for the nose heavy condition. These crashes are happening on takeoff which just happens to be when the wings have the most fuel in them making them even more nose heavy. I believe on takeoff the forward weight is causing a nose down condition and when the flight computer tries to compensate bringing the nose up the computer goes to far and the engines stall which is why the plane was seen smoking when it was falling down. The problem is that if I'm right Boeing can never admit it because the liability and the cost of buying all of the defective planes back would bankrupt them which is why we didn't want to ground them.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1124471)	3/13/2019 8:24:39 PM
From: James Seagrove	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Respond to of 1578290

To the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut. Gentlemen The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing. Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties. I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem. Th Jefferson Jan. 1. 1802.