Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1124514)	3/14/2019 12:59:46 AM
From: Sdgla	6 Recommendations Recommended By FJB locogringo majaman1978 Mick Mørmøny PKRBKR and 1 more member Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576881

Thats laughable. 2 years of investigating Trump and attacking Manafort for tax evasion and you think sending and receiving the highest levels of classified information on an unsecured server couldn’t be prosecuted for intent or gross negligence. The rule of law doesn’t apply for Dems. 0bama & holder perverted and corrupted the DOJ.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1124514)	3/14/2019 1:07:50 AM
From: i-node	7 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Joe Btfsplk locogringo Mick Mørmøny PKRBKR and 2 more members Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576881

>> She pushed back against the suggestion that the FBI “blew over” potentially charging Clinton with gross negligence under the Espionage Act, saying officials did consider it — but decided that the move would be too “constitutionally vague,” unprecedented, and “that they did not feel that they could sustain a charge.” This is, simply put, a lie. The documents in the link I provided clearly showed that Loretta Lynch ruled it out. Not based on the law. But based on a tarmac meeting with the target's husband. It is fucking Democrat partisan politics as usual. Damn right they never get charged. Except maybe Weiner for dicky-waving.