Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mister topes who wrote (2914)	1/19/1998 10:58:00 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

And at $69 it was short term undervalued and ripe to rally and it did. And then the rally failed at $77. End of story. In spite of all the negative comments, I learned something from the Brink's trading discussion for Intel so I hope he continues. My only question was "what makes Intel so good (for trading) compared to say UTEK or AMAT or LRCX that I own and are quite volitle acting almost as derivatives for stock like INTC." I think I heard my answer on the show which was "liquidity". I might say AMAT has similar liquidity, but then it isn't the same marque name which might be reason #2. I used to trade HWP with my commission free 401K account but I found I didn't get the returns to justify the time. Several yrs later and a good, proprietary cost model and what I've learned from The Brink's discussion of Intel, I just might try again! What I like about HWP is that even if I miss, the stock usually outperforms overall and I just get stuck waiting for it to get ahead of itself again to trade out. Intel looks to be the same making for reason #3 for a good trading stock (from what I can tell). Thanks Kirk out