SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: j g cordes who wrote (15950)1/20/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
"Carol, what women might call vulnerability men would call empathy. "

Why on earth do you say that? Vulnerability means open to attack, while one can be empathetic with or without another person's knowledge. That just means capable of understanding another's feelings. Which might be weakness for a warrior/hunter, actually. We had a pretty good debate somewhere, on Rambi or Feelies, about who would have more empathy, men or women. It is my opinion that empathy would be selected for in women but not men. Women raise children, you need empathy to assess the needs of an infant. Women also by and large maintain the culture, and do more interactive scoial activities. I would think that empathy for a hunter would be a problem. Same goes for the guys that need to protect thier village from marauders. And with all due respect to your amazon women, armies made up of women are the exception just as societies which contain men as the primary childrearers are. In fact, I can't think of a one.



To: j g cordes who wrote (15950)1/20/1998 3:24:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Ummmmm, I think you've got this wrong. What we're talking about here, if I mistake it not, is guys who'll open up and tell you they cried when their puppy died. And His voice'll get a little husky in the telling. Sooooo sexy, no?



To: j g cordes who wrote (15950)1/20/1998 3:57:00 PM
From: Carol  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
<<The root problem is within the word itself.. "vulnerable" something most men are, in their agressive thoughts, very aware of.>>

Jim, I think you are absolutely right that its the word itself that is the problem.

It's very hard for a man to view himself as vulnerable when he has to function in a dog eat dog world every day. And you are right, women dispise weak men, unless they have a problem and need that.

But, that is not what a woman means when she says, "vulnerable" empathy is a more suitable, but I'm not sure it conveys the whole meaning.

Good insight, you are well on you way to "sexy vulnerability/empathy" in my book.

):-)

Carol