Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Mansfield who wrote (9137)	1/20/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: Mark B. Stutman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 31646

Thanks for the links. Scott Lehrbaum (Ampro Computers, slehrbaum@ampro.com) authored an article in the January 1998 issue of the journal 'Circuit Cellar Ink, The computer applications journal' entitled 'Year 2000 and Embedded PCs'. This journal, published by Steve Ciarcia, a well respected and well published electrical engineer (I presume), is heavily geared to the hands-on EE and electronics enthusiast. I subscribe to it so I can remain abreast of what I wish I could do... I'd don't want to run afoul of copyright law, so let me try to summarize and post a short quote or two. The byline states 'The year-2000 phenomenon incites many hyped predictions of people trapped in elevators, loss of infrastructure, never mind millions of dollars. According to Scott, though, all embedded PCs need is a software patch. Read how it's done." The four page article proceeds from a description of the millenium bug, and the problem as it manifests itself in a PC: The real-time clock, the BIOS, DOS/BIOS interactions, and Application software. He provides a software patch, and describes a strategy for "shore(ing) up the defenses of older embedded-PC compatibles" using a software upgrade. I don't claim to understand what he describes. He then sensibly cautions users to contact vendors for support, and cautions that many situations may require case-by-case evaluation. The article appears targeted at vendors of electronics with embedded-PCs on them. Options include dispatching service personnel to the installation sites, and return of boards to the factory for updates. He concludes: "The good news is that PCs in their many diverse form factors are much less likely to suffer from ill effects than mainframe computers and other predecessors..." I get the impression that a savvy EE might not find the problem to be daunting. On the other hand, I would guess that there are far more embedded-PCs out there than there are person-hours to coddle them. My point? I'm just providing an industry perspective that I encountered. Mark Stutman (largely a lurker) long on TPRO since 7/97.