Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stanley new who wrote (4780)	1/21/1998 12:20:00 AM
From: francis terry	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

To Stanley: Great,if you want to put a pencil to it please use a golden one. Good things come to those that wait. To my friend or fellow share holder whoom I hold in high esteim, how how sweet it is. To all those who have given their shares away for dust, try to get back on board, and stay on this time. The Train ain't left yet. Boy is this great or what? to cKRT shareholders this has been a prety good day also. Is this a dream or what. ----LOL Francis Terry

To: stanley new who wrote (4780)	1/21/1998 1:28:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

<<Do you or any others here know much about this company? Hope there are no skeletons in their closet to jump out and scare investors.>> Ah...well, maybe one skeleton. Auric was the company that IPM used last summer to announce that they had a fire assay that indicated about .80 opt of Au and Pt. After IPM's "Black Friday" press release (which indicated that everything the company had previously said about fire assay and recovery was, shall we say, exagerated), IPM posted Q and A's on their web site. One of the Q's was "what happened to the Auric Fire Assay of .80 opt" (a pertinent question since now IPM was back down to .03 opt). The answer was that Auric's fire assay was "not repeatable." Who knows what the real story was between IPM and Auric, but this suggests at least the possibility of a skeleton.