Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fiberman who wrote (31447)	1/21/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

The big deal is that it happen in the White House, don't get me wrong if I was married to his wife I would also stay.

To: fiberman who wrote (31447)	1/21/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: mike thomas	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 61433

it becomes the peoples business when he lies under oath and encourages others to do the same. regards

To: fiberman who wrote (31447)	1/21/1998 4:22:00 PM
From: uu	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 61433

You know, I used to be a hard core Republican. I have never voted for any Democrats. But with all these talks and allegations against Clinton, I think things are getting a bit out of hand and I have started to really respect Clintion simply because he is taking so much crap from the media (provoked by most likely no other than Republicans) and yet he is doing an excellent job of being a president. This is crazy! Even if he had an affair with the 24 year old at White House (a highly improbable case if not impossible), so what? Are people (and I should say mostly men) jealous of him because he can be such a stud? Regards,

To: fiberman who wrote (31447)	1/21/1998 4:30:00 PM
From: Ken Moser	Respond to of 61433

The big deal is not that he dropped his pants AGAIN - The big deal is that he and his laweyer convinced the young lady to LIE in a sworn deposition. Sounds pretty serious to me. Last I heard that constituted obstruction of justice. Regards ..... Ken

To: fiberman who wrote (31447)	1/21/1998 6:36:00 PM
From: Father E.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

The womens organization have been sceaming at companies that whenver a superior has a relationship with a subordinate it is a form of sexual harrasment. There has been lawsuits on this issue. The President doing it shows that he does not think there is a problem with it. So all his speeches on sexual harrassment is garbage. The other issue is that he happens to be a married man. Even though Hillary left him for a year many years ago he is still a married man. Infidelity in your own home is still a terrible act especially to us religious people that feel marriage is a bond between two people that should not abused. The other issue is telling someone to lie before a court of law is illegal and the President believe it or not is not supposed to be above the law. Although at times it is not apparent. I read that Hillary donated used undergarments to a charity and took a deuction at full retail value even she didn't pay that price for it. Is that legal? No. Is that even a reasonable act for someone that practices law. No!! It is tacky and shows disdain for our tax laws. So why should anyone be held more accountable that her? (If I recall the IRS did not do anything to her for doing it). I would like to hear a comment from Al Gore the supposed <<family man>>.