SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Flagrante Delictu who wrote (13577)1/21/1998 11:20:00 PM
From: Hippieslayer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
Bernie,

Clinton never actually touched her. His reasoning is that he was wearing a condom. No touching, no affair. End of case!



To: Flagrante Delictu who wrote (13577)1/22/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: celeryroot.com  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Seems the line is getting bigger and bigger, now it involves a stiff dug up in Arlington



To: Flagrante Delictu who wrote (13577)1/22/1998 6:12:00 PM
From: John O'Neill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
Since you guys & gals brought it up...

I'm glad Geraldo will get to grind thru this one. This is so much bullshit maybe the American public will start thinking about their (generally) morbid fascination with other peoples problems.

Remember OJ Simpson?...every second of it for 2 years. Then he's found guilty in civil suit (requires a preponderance of evidence) but the crux of the issue I never heard about. I.E. why does he have custody of his kids? This is the only meaningfull part. Maybe he should have custody, but the press dropped that one..the important one.. which shows how our govt reacts too these situations and not just what some stupid jury thinks. . The jury stuff was an all bullshit 50/50 chance with 12 people. I suppose with all the books they write they make the most lucrative verdict. Either that or the OJ jury was the dumbmest collection of 12 people I've seen. Geraldo really zoomed in on a winner..pandering to the prejudicial part of people. What he do without that angle? What scandle could he follow/create. Too bad because he used to be a good reporter.

Who the hell cares whether Clinton propositioned Jones or not? What, his word against his ?+ plus whe want $2 MIL attorney fees paid by taxpayers thru tax exempt replublican foudation. Mabe the visibility of this case will wake up Americans about the value of their purient interests & love of jury trials. By they way..Anyone can expose themselves to me and proposition me if I can get $ 2 MIL...I would do everything to encourage it! But, of course I'm ethical and would not do that --.How about Jones?

The pendulum always swings too far when society attempts reform.
Women/ minorities have gotten a raw deal, but now it's been over done. I hope this Clinton affair swings it back the other way. I could care less if he propositoned Jones or not...I just want a capable President..the rest is between him and Hillary..

Any Comments?