Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (150312)	8/26/2019 6:55:36 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217774

Yeup, whether PPT or the usual boyz month-end swoop I earlier suspected Message 32299615 somebody(ies) swooped in. We are lucky that such counterparties exist. On <<Foreign Affairs>>, point me the way and I have way in and happy to share. On trade war, for any number of reasons you see if you are right, or I see if I am right, to be for awhile Message 32299915 Obviously, by taking what you and I both noted, the basis for negotiation does not exist. Trade wars are typically fought, not negotiated, and so until pain points become excruciating, no negotiations possible. Team China will not budge. Team America will not budge. The world goes to the next level. It is possible that the trump believes he can win 2020 either way whichever way by trade war prosecution.