To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (6506 ) 1/22/1998 3:11:00 PM From: Zardoz Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116760
Au contraire, Ole 49r this is about GOLD, the shiny metal. Talking about whether or not Clinton did some woman is not what this thread is about... I'm not harping on most of the postings done erlier today. We can agree that LACK of leadership may very well effect the market place. Causing gold to soar. Dollar's to dive. But who did what to whom, when, and why is not of importance. Yes, many people have posted related articles, showing their validations on why gold will go here, there, and everywhere. I do to. And that is the essence of this thread. Sharing beliefs about GOLD. But than again the point can be made that an inpeachment of Clinton can be a positive. The Republican party will get in and straighten everything out. I don't care about politics in the USA, cause as most business people know, it the social service that holds the real power in Washington. Mock trials are just that, mock. A total waste of time. It's like watching a movie, something to fill in the hours between the market close to open! Driving back to whether the US did, didn't know that Japan was going to attack is really a case of War mongering. Unless you want to talk about the effect of WAR of the price of gold, than you are wasting the bandwidth. Many kind people marke the first line with ***off topic*** so that those of us interest in Gold related comments can click by the unrelated crap. But than few of the post today said anything related to gold, or gave no relationship between the comments of Clinton and gold. You last posting could of scratched down to the last paragraph about Nixon {with repect to gold. Ok, leave the cyberfriend part in as well} and I would of been totally applauding you for it. {not that you need applause}