Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sowbug who wrote (33)	1/22/1998 2:06:00 PM
From: username	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

bug the url aint poppin for me. you da man ta fix it. :o)

To: Sowbug who wrote (33)	1/22/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

On a serious note, however this plays out legally, Clinton is toast politically. He's more than ever a lame duck now and the Republican Congress is going to eat his agenda for lunch. It blows me away that someone of his intelligence (he really ain't no dummy) could throw away his legacy in such a STUPID manner.

To: Sowbug who wrote (33)	1/22/1998 2:19:00 PM
From: username	Respond to of 20981

BINGO! Ya got those dilithium crystals aligned just in time. I never lost faith, bro.

To: Sowbug who wrote (33)	1/22/1998 2:20:00 PM
From: uu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Sowbug: You state: > but there are questions* about whether Clinton broke the law in committing subornation, and if so, what to do about it.* Without causing an irrational verbal attacks upon myself, I just have one question: What happened to the concept of assuming one innocent until proven guilty when all the facts and truth are known for sure?! I never thought I would ever be defending Bill Clinton (unlike you I have never liked the man or his politics). But what bothers me is when media and politicians alike manipulate the assumptions and play with public's mind. This is exactly what happened to both Ross Perot and Bob Dole. Sure there maybe some truth to some of the stuff, but manipulation and exxagerations in my opinion is simply wrong. Clinton's presidency has been very good for the country (if not the world). But not because it was he who did anything special, but rather because he did not do anything significant and allowed what Reagn's presidency started to finally reach its destination (and please do not mock me for my beliefs!). At this point in time I do not want under any situation to see the downfall of Clinton's presidency. It will simply be bad for you, me, and practically everyone else on the face of the panet earth. And believe it or not right now my wish is not for my ASND, or COMS or... shares to go up, but rather to see this whole scandle put to rest at all costs and as soon as possible. Regards, Addi Jamshidi

To: Sowbug who wrote (33)	1/22/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: Diane	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Oh pleeeeeease!!!! Clinton has surrounded himself with far more crooks (Ron Brown, Mike Espy, Juang, Wang, Triste, Livingstone, W. Kennedy, Altman, Jean Hanson etc etc), felons (McDougal and something like 14 other people who have been CONVICTED of felonies in whitewater), liars (Gore, Cisneros, and just about anyone Clinton associates with) and idiots (Jocelyn Elders, Donna Shalala etc etc) than any president in history. And the only thing Clinton had to do with the healthy economy was to not screw up what Bush had already started and to have the sense to listen to the Republicans.