Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: uu who wrote (68)	1/22/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: username	Respond to of 20981

Thanks, Addi; hey, no offense intended. We are just tryin' to keep things light, and I don't mean that in a bad way. You can vote any way you want to. You vote no, and that's cool. pete

To: uu who wrote (68)	1/22/1998 6:13:00 PM
From: Sowbug	Respond to of 20981

Addi, I'm not sure I'm quick enough to keep up with you and figure out what your point is. You have your opinion, obviously, and I have mine. At least one person in this scandal is lying -- I think we can agree about that. We can also agree that it's important that all legal procedures be followed in this case, including all procedures that preserve the constitutional guaranty of due process. As I've told you, I think you're crazy to hold the opinion you hold. You're of course free to say whatever you think about my opinion (maybe you have already, I'm not sure). What I object to is when people say "You can't think that! You can't say that! He's innocent until proven guilty!" Yes, Clinton is legally innocent unless and until he's proven guilty. But in my mind, I have heard enough to conclude that it's more likely than not that he did have the affair. Thus, I think he did it. That's my personal justice system, and it's probably a good thing I'm not running the country. Long Clinton @ 1992 and 1996 ...... Sowbug