SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Rocky's Personal Iomega Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alan Rosen who wrote (80)1/22/1998 4:59:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 166
 
Thank you

Believe me, I gain no satisfaction from other people's misery (even though some here would like to disagree). I wish everyone could make tons and tons of money, and live happily ever after. But this market is a take no prisoners business. I've lost money before in IOM ( as others here gleefully point out), but I've had two pretty good succesive short term trades in it. This will be the last trade I ever deal in IOM. For Iomega, the party is over. The stock will go into hibernation.

A lot of what I've read in the earnings report reflects a great deal with what I've been saying all along. Take this for example:

"Our combined Zip and Jaz businesses grew 48% over the fourth quarter last year and 54% on a full-year basis," Edwards continued.

A lot of Iomega investors base their support on Zips becoming standard with every computer under the sun. This will not happen. The numbers bear this out. A 54% increase in business year to year is impressive for any industry, but this rate of growth does not make for a standard when you begin the year with <3% Zip inclusion, and end it with <6% inclusion. This with the fact that mega-corp Sony is due out this year with a competing product that has better all-around specs and features, and the muscle to sell it at a loss to get the drives in the boxes. Sony can then exercies the "razor blade" model to gain back its short term losses.

Zips are in a lot of places. But they are not everywhere. The numbers speak for themselves.