Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1172643)	10/20/2019 3:18:32 PM
From: ryanaka	Respond to of 1571414

wrong.

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1172643)	10/20/2019 3:38:13 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571414

That is Zharkovas latest report, but has received some criticism because of an error in the Earths orbit calculations. It does not change her accurate forecast of the Suns activity. However, the overall theme looks to be correct, and she is speaking on behalf of a number of researchers I think. Some of the projections look to be similar to others. She is a tough cookie and having grown up in the Ukraine during the soviet era, knows how to challenge flawed authoritative views. I think things are still being hashed out and I am looking forward to future presentations. Anyone can be wrong, but I am a firm believer of the scientific process, and that all sides should be heard equally. At the moment there is unjustified bias. The cyclical nature of recent temperate trends from long term processes is the most likely scenario, and one wonders why there is such a hullabaloo over that view. Well, ... it's the human condition to be self important in these matters I guess. Hence the human race is "controlling climate" has grown into this (and probably passing) fashion. It was your posts, from years back... well presented... but from an opposite view then mine, that changed my perspective that CO2 induced climate change was a problem. At the time, I just trusted what official sources were telling me, and that the published academic views were correct. That does not seem to the case now that I have studied things more closely. This is a graph from Dr Norman Page in January 2019. It appears to be familiar in some respects... climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com but According to Bruce Wielick scientists dont conspire. -g- I showed this link earlier.. youtube.com note "changed cloud cover by just one (1%) percent". ummm... (cough) "cosmic rays Dr Wielick" !!! Zharkovas original paper from 2015 can be traced back from here. Message 32376665