Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1172661)	10/20/2019 5:36:24 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571673

"Mainly because they dont seriously look at the fact the immediate prospect that the planet is about to become wetter and cooler in the near future. " Maybe that's not actually a fact. "Some IPCC hot shots have done their best trashing the Earths Orbit calculations w.r.t the Sun in her latest paper." Bad math is not conducive to one's standing in the scientific community. "In a series of egregious errors in the 1990s and 2000s, Dr. Christy and his partner Roy Spencer, actually managed to read their satellite data as showing the planet cooling, a 180 wrongway boneheaded analysis, let’s call it “Freedom Science” – that they defended stubbornly for more than a decade, until the overwhelming weight of evidence forced them to admit they were wrong. For ordinary people, blowing it that bad could be a career killer – but if you are telling climate deniers and wealthy barons of the world’s most profitable industry what they want to hear, it makes you the toast of Washington " climatecrocks.com realclimate.org

To: maceng2 who wrote (1172661)	10/21/2019 5:25:24 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1571673

There is no science evidence that CO2 has or is causing any of the increase in global temperatures via a greenhouse gas mechanism. There is no science evidence that the so called sensitivities postulated by the IPCC with their models has any connection with reality. youtube.com this ted talk is by an IPCC shill. It is garbage. IMHO But CO2 non greenhouse effects global land temperatures may go up. The mean temperature of green areas is higher than the mean temperature of deserts. Deserts are decreasing and green areas are getting greener and increasing. In higher latitude area increased taller green growth could shorten the length of snow cover over time. Taller growth being dark bark would absorb solar energy earlier and conduct down into the ground sooner. Branches create wind breaks. leaf cover also insulates and decay generates heat. And green means far more productive biospheres. All of these things capture the sun's heat of the day and store for slow release. How many extra megatons of biomass are created daily in a land area twice the size of the USA. I took Zharkova comment on C02 as understanding the fist of the IPCC environmental mafia as her work show it is the Sun, the Sun and the Sun. Or she is doing her work and has not analyzed what IPCC hot shots are saying and why. She assumes they are as competent and ethical as she is and take them at their word. In the PDF there is description of a hind cast and it showed some connection to past warm and cold periods. IPCC models are a hind casting joke of some imaginary lala land. My impression does not see a more Mathematician than Physicist and a political realist.