Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1175328)	11/2/2019 7:24:36 PM
From: Land Shark	2 Recommendations Recommended By pocotrader sylvester80 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571405

Another FatRumptard loser: Joe Arpaio loses $300M defamation lawsuit against CNN, HuffPost, Rolling nypost.com

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1175328)

11/2/2019 7:58:34 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571405

It is on the constitution for Christ's sake! Along with the emoluments clause.

Good lord, don't you know this stuff?

<,

Well, it's something I've said all along. There was no quid pro quo, but even if there was, it is not illegal for a President to use our allies to investigate criminal wrongdoing, such as what the Bidens did. Quid pro quo is only wrong when it enriches yourself in public service, just as the Bidens did.

The Democrats know that Biden was most probably involved in a self-enrichment scheme for his family, using his power of office. This is a felony. So they are doing everything in their power to strike at Trump before he could make progress in that investigation. It's exactly what Hillary did with the Mueller investigation. She had her lackeys accuse Trump of what she herself was guilty of, in order to gas light the public and get out of the crimes she was guilty of. It worked brilliantly and now the Democrats are using the same playbook to keep their own out of trouble.

Nothing is new under the sun.