Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (16475)	1/23/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: MSB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Can't say I would know how to respond or even if I should, but I can't pass up the opportunity to waste space.<g> I think all abortions should be legalized up until the start of the second trimester with one stipulation. All those choosing this route also agree to have their tubes tied, and the father of said unwanted child will have his "nut cut". This would all be paid for by the government (us). Then if the woman wanted to have children in the future, she could pay the expense to undo the procedure (if in fact it is even possible. Obviously, I don't know). And if the male wanted to have children, FIND A MATE THAT WANTS TO ADOPT! I think the above suggestion would go a long way to solving many of the problems of having children, like being unable to properly care for them, or having an abortion as a fail-safe option. Only one draw back, neither, on either side of the issue, would be willing to accept the compromise, hence we would continue the fight through rehtoric and polarization. I disagree that we may eventually see abortion going back to the "back alley". What else have we pushed back once it was fully entrenched in our society?