SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Intrepid1 who wrote (20137)11/13/2019 5:43:16 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37302
 
The whole emphasis on immigration from elsewhere was to undermine French nationalism. Multiculturalism meant that in effect the French became just one of the many nations rather than a special one. Yes, I know all about their official status, but I am talking in practice.

So if there is anyone who should be pissed off, it is the French Canada. They thought they are getting one thing on paper, only to realize there was a backdoor to dilute it away.

Now we can debate whether or not that was the right thing to do. But omitting it from a student of history is a pretty big omission.



To: Intrepid1 who wrote (20137)11/13/2019 7:14:45 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum1 Recommendation

Recommended By
johnlw

  Respond to of 37302
 
From the post world war two era to 1992 over 90% of immigrants to Canada were from Caucasian countries.

Due to changes in most of those home countries.. they thought the deal better to stay put after 1992... so we had to look at the next option... Ravages of WWII were long gone..
pretty simple...

BEST OPTION.. all current Canadians have min 3 kids... problem solved...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News