Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SG who wrote (7962)	1/23/1998 9:11:00 PM
From: Nanny	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11098

Steve Andrew reminds me of Bill Clinton: some were dumb enough to believe him ONCE and are confused why he thinks they should believe him again.....and again....and again........ Not only has the time value of money not been kind to him, his information has not been too kind to him either.....He said <<<Please don't harass me as to my source's identity, I will only say that he has been 100% accurate in the past and not given to hype or fiction.>>> Message 282289 Then he back pedaled, just like Clinton......it will ....just not now......gets nasty too, just like Clinton...my enemies are out to get me! <<<This adverse arbitration decision WILL come down and may well be delayed for the next few months. You can wait with your position. I'll wait with mine. Time will tell. Happy to make you "think." a bit more!>>> Message 316104 He stated in another post around this time that he has "14 years" as an investment advisor of some type. Not worth looking up right now! He said <<< I am told that the announcement of the arbitration decision will now be made sometime near the third week of December.>>>..... and this post is dated October 2nd! He also said <<<If it makes you feel better to attack the information sharing of others, then go right ahead and knock yourself out. The entertainment value is worth it.>>> This is entertainment...and he's a professional? Message 319937 It's been said that the truth will set you free! Here's the truth, dated October 16, 1996. Makes you want to take his advice on everything he says! Just like I can't understand how Bill Clinton can show his face in public, I can't understand how Steve Andrew can show up here giving advice and comments! techstocks.com Did someone mention the word "fool"....aahhh.......Steve Andrew used that word! You hang in there Scott! Don't be swayed by the "professionals" on this thread. We'll be right in the end. Don't be surprised if the 4th quarter earnings are a record! I've been under the weather and haven't been able to keep up with all the bears trying to "negative" you away but I think I'm starting to feel better now.....my arthritic fingers can "speak" again....and those old rusty patents probably haven't been gathering dust....good news must be on the way! Take care! Nanny PS If you want more Steve Andrew "goodies", I've got them in their own separate folder.....just let me know!

To: SG who wrote (7962)	1/24/1998 10:12:00 AM
From: Steve Andrew	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11098

To Scott and Nanny... I'd still rather own Forecross in the single digits (albeit with a smaller profit) than be long a single share of the hyped up PRST. FRX management is not tainted with regulatory inquiry and shareholder lawsuits. That company is a legitimate prospect with no history of squeezing and hyping and other BS. You both are victims of believing others who spin and yarn away for their own benefit. Nanny....has Chapman, et. al. been quiet recently , with SNRS, Carrington, and PRST all deflated? Nanny, your post is , as usual, a highlight film for your ignorance. I was wrong about the suit.....big deal....I was right (and VERY WELL REWARDED) about the direction of PRST stock....YOU HAVE NOT BEEN since then. I do enjoy watching the both of you squirm with your beloved PRST, after civil discourse has disintegrated into whining about the bears (and even suing them, if necessary, to deafen their voices). Prior to the exisitence of this SI thread, I was informing others of the Howard-Lutts-Chapman-Walker-Hudson, N.H. hype job. (Check out the MF board, under Jax B Dawg). Your glory days of short-squeezing and other ARTIFICIAL levitation of this name are OVER!! Too Bad you were not wise enough to leave the party on a timely basis. PRST will undoubtedly continue to PROMISE great alliances and future relationships and little-valued patents inorder to keep you suckers in their stock. It is , after all, necessary to allow all the early investors(read: friends of the hypesters) a chance to escape unscathed. PRST will, most likely, never deliver enough on these PROMISES to warrant any stock appreciation from here. Technology is married to timeliness, and timeliness is married to execution. PRST has shown NO sign of adhering to this tenet. Sorry to see you both so blindly smitten with this irresponsible group of shysters, but if you must...you must. Nanny, I must say your brand of cheerleading is most entertaining, for you have been expounding on the virtues of PRST the longest, and with full blinders on. Your ignorance of the facts and ethical responsibility from the Hudson Hucksters chime in like a chapter from one of the great investment tomes of all time: "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, by Lefevre." That book, written in 1923, could have been written by the PRST crew in 1995. Go for it Nanny....its a free country and your unbashed ignorance is fully protected (unless, of course, you choose to disbelieve). Also, I have SO many better things to do than keep files of others postings so as to piecemeal attempt to discredit them. Get a life!!!! Scott, I do still hold my gem, as well as CTYA, KIWT,QWST, and T, among others. I'll bet my investing track record against yours any day of the week. Read up a bit, my boy. You might want to start with "The Intelligent Investor, by Ben Graham. It will illustrate just enough fundamentals to offset your foolish analysis. (Sorry, no pictures in that book). Joe, you are absolutely correct. The risk/reward edge of remaining short here is diminishing and I am not carrying any kind of substantial position forward. It has probably seen some loss of downside momentum and my have a small bounce. I am ,obviously, and due to my long history of trading PRST, remaining acutely interested in observing. An unbiased and fresh analysis, like yours, is always a positive addition to any securities discussion. Good Luck to all but the Swine...