SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (46305)1/23/1998 9:19:00 PM
From: Jay  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul Re "each roll of the dice costs about 2 billion dollars."

Why is all $2b needed for a plant? - Isn't it possible to buy and build in stages?

Just wondering..



To: Paul Engel who wrote (46305)1/25/1998 1:15:00 AM
From: Barry A. Watzman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
(ON Topic, after my last message)

Paul, you probably know more about what is going on inside Intel than anyone here, but I can't help but believe that the DEC settlement, including the coming and sudden acquisition of DEC's CPU fab plant, which was known internally but whose knowledge was not yet public, was not a MAJOR factor in the realignment of Intel's capital investments in fab plants. They simply didn't see a NEED for both the DEC fab plant and fab 16 in Ft. Worth, and they had no ability to make a choice -- the DEC plant was a lynchpin of the settlement agreement.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (46305)1/26/1998 3:13:00 PM
From: Aaron Cooperband  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul -

Re: "Fab 16 remains mothballed at this point"

Thanks for clearing up my understanding. Intel's announcement WAS confusing.

Its comforting to know that Intel has this unutilized capacity waiting to be activated. This gives them a lot of flexibility. When its finally activated and starts producting revenue, it will already be partially depreciated - giving an extra boost to earnings!

Aaron