SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (16828)1/24/1998 3:59:00 AM
From: Lady Lurksalot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Michael,

Of course Ronnie was a great speaker! Would you expect less from the Prez from Central Casting? Shall we discuss supply-side economics and the trickle-down theory? The Homeless? They're practically an ethnic group now. I believe that Seattle has enlightened and compassionate programs for The Homeless. Be forewarnd, however: Seattle's near complete eradication of its homeless has caught the attention of San Francisco, a city with a large number of homeless. An article in the SF Chronicle the other day suggested that if SF were to purchase one-way Greyhound bus tickets to Seattle for The Homeless of San Francisco, it would solve the problem here once and for all.

Ronnie opened the floodgates and sent to the streets many people of marginal mental capacity who were largely unable to function in society. He also deregulated a lot of things which we now see should have stayed regulated.

President Reagan's policies of less government perhaps gave the citizenry a rush of feelgoodness at the illusion that he was cutting government spending, but I think if we look at the overall picture, we see that it has cost us more in the long run--much, much more, and not just in dollars.

President Bush? In my opinion, he did about four good things while he was in office, and I've forgotten three of them. We did get a lot of good humor mileage out of his running mate, however. His failure at reelection pretty much says it all about his Administration. Some say he would have done better if he'd eaten more broccoli.

President Nixon was a strange one. I think most Amaricans disagreed with his wage and price freeze of 1971. He was long on foreign policy, but fell short on domestic policy smarts. He hung with the wrong people, mostly his college and poker playing buddies and, worse, turned them into trusted advisors and cabinet members. He did misspeak when discussing the school lunch programs, stating that catsup was a vegetable.

The less said about the Carter Administration, the better, IMO. I still can't figure how he won that election. Does anybody remember the mid-sized earthquake in Southern California that occurred the day after President Carter waa elected?

Holly



To: greenspirit who wrote (16828)1/24/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 108807
 
So he allowed himself to compromise his core belief's in Tax rates.

Bush doesn't seem to have had any "core beliefs", or if he did, he was ever willing to compromise them. Backwards and forwards. Remember his criticism of Reagan's "voodoo economics"? Which he supported wholeheartedly once he was Ron's running mate? And his initial stand on abortion, which he reversed 180 degrees (while Barbara never changed her mind)?

Politicians are....politicians.