SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (150574)1/21/2020 12:06:51 AM
From: Sam3 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
CentralParkRanger
combjelly

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 364203
 
I already replied to Turley's piece.

Their contention is that if Hunter Biden looks corrupt and if it looks like Joe Biden had the prosecutor Shokin fired because he was investigating Hunter, then Trump's request for an investigation into him looks good. But they are completely ignoring the fact that it wasn't just Joe who wanted Shokin fired. It was many different people in the international community and Ukraine itself who wanted Shokin fired precisely because Shokin was NOT investigating companies like Burisma. And that is what is so outlandish about the whole thing.

Message 32511710

Your presumption that Joe Biden got Shokin fired to help his son is false. A ten minute google search of documents from that period would show that. But of course, you guys are always just making stuff up to suit your POV with zero evidence to back it up. Oh yeah, there were a couple of John Solomon columns written a few months ago which made spurious assertions again with no actual evidence. But nothing contemporaneous with the firing itself corroborates your story and everything corroborates the view that what Biden did had widespread support and that it was Shokin who was corrupt and not investigating Burisma. The very opposite of what you guys claim.

But no doubt that won't stop you and Trump from continuing to shamelessly lie about it.



To: i-node who wrote (150574)1/21/2020 10:17:26 AM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 364203
 
"Hunter Biden is a clearly material witness to the defense"
Nope; he only reads and watches with the rest of us. He wasn't a witness to any of this shit.

"from the perspective of the defense, the worst Hunter looks, the better the hold looks"
Let me guess; the worse Hunter looks, the worse his father looks. This is personal gain for Trump, not the national interest. That makes it illegal.