Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jess Beltz who wrote (640)	1/24/1998 9:18:00 PM
From: Investor2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

"The point, as far as the public trust is concerned, AND as far as Kenneth Starr is concerned (IMO) is: is he guilty of obstruction of justice?" Today I heard that he may be guilty of perjury, which I believe is a felony. A felony is an impeachable offense. Best wishes, I2

To: Jess Beltz who wrote (640)	1/24/1998 9:29:00 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Jess, <<is he guilty of obstruction of justice? If not: this too shall pass.>> I don't think resignation hinges on proof of criminal charges. He has already been dealt a mortal wound politically. I personally feel the same as you vis a vis Roman orgies, but the majority of voters in this country won't countenance an affair between the president and a 21 year old intern, regardless of whether or not laws were broken. I think we'll see, in the coming days, the strongest pressure for him to resign coming from fellow Democrats. If he fights to stay in office and drags this on and on, the upcoming Fall elections are going to be a slaughter. All this IMO, of course.