Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamie153 who wrote (1196547)	1/27/2020 11:03:26 AM
From: TideGlider	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB locogringo Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573849

I haven't seen Bolton saying that. I do know he was fired for trying to drag us into another ground war in the mid east. 't

To: Jamie153 who wrote (1196547)	1/27/2020 11:12:10 AM
From: Thomas M.	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573849

Too bad the Democrats were in too much of a hurry to get Bolton to testify in the House. Sad! Tom

To: Jamie153 who wrote (1196547)	2/2/2020 10:19:48 AM
From: Bill	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573849

Guilty of what? What’s the crime?

To: Jamie153 who wrote (1196547)	2/2/2020 10:46:32 AM
From: Maple MAGA	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573849

Guilty of what?

To: Jamie153 who wrote (1196547)	2/2/2020 12:43:55 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573849

poor poor cowardly anonymous lying asshole troll jamie. you are a cowardly anonymous lying asshole troll not because you want post all manner of slander and stupidity. you are a cowardly anonymous lying asshole troll because you post all manner of slander and stupidity. President Trump may have wanted to use USA aid to Ukraine to investigate past corruption including the clear smelly quid pro quo of joe. The clear smelly quid pro quo of joe is based upon joes own public admission of an actual quid pro quo. If I were running for President I would want all to know that my past smelly admitted to quid pro quo was not smelly and have it fully examined. But I have a standard of honesty and quid pro quo of joe proves he does not. So what we know so far is President Trump may have discussed tjhe smelly admitted to quid pro quo joe affair, but no effort was made to act upon any investigation of any past corruption including the smelly admitted to quid pro quo joe affair to influence Ukraine conduct to receive aid.. In your posts it is clear that you could never be guilty of a thought crime. I have never seen any of jamie's posts that reveal you have ever had a thought. But the act of publishing a posts convicts you of being guilty of being a cowardly anonymous lying asshole troll. In the present situation you have no proof "Bolton says Trump is guilty" We do have proof in actual transcript and all who actually listened to or witnessed the call no quid pro quo occurred. There is no evidence witnessed by anyone who were involved in the aid process that President Trump implemented a quid pro quo conditional on aid. If there were any overwhelming proof of that their would be a charge of bribery in the articles of impeachment. There was no evidence of a quid pro quo.