SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (1198076)2/2/2020 1:57:34 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 1573857
 
OOPS! tRump's US EMPLOYMENT REPORT HIDES THE NUMBER OF DISCOURAGED WORKERS...WHICH IS WHY WAGE GROWTH SUCKS & IS GETTING WORSE
SARAH FOSTER@SARAHFFOSTER
OCTOBER 7, 2019 in SMART MONEY
bankrate.com
It’s the best time in decades to find a job — at least that’s what the headline employment numbers suggest. But take a closer look, and you might see a different story.

Before the Great Recession, there were about five discouraged workers — or individuals who haven’t looked for a job in the past four weeks because they don’t believe there’s one out there for them — per every 100 unemployed Americans, according to data from the Labor Department. During the immediate aftermath of the downturn in December of 2010, that ratio climbed as high as 10 individuals. It’s since averaged out to about seven.

That’s despite the national unemployment rate plunging to 3.5 percent, the lowest in 50 years. Employers have added positions for almost nine years straight, a record, and they continued that streak in the Labor Department’s September employment report. It also goes against popular narratives of firms struggling to find enough workers to fill open positions.

“The recession has changed something in the labor market,” says Julia Pollak, a labor economist at ZipRecruiter, an online employment marketplace. The ratio of discouraged workers to the unemployed “has stayed almost flat, and it’s about 95,000 more discouraged workers than we should have, given the unemployment rate.”

The data is illustrative of some broader issues, economists say, including lukewarm wage gains and employers who have been slow to increase hours. They also say the unemployment rate might not be as useful of an indicator when judging the strength of the labor market.

“No longer does the unemployment rate tell you much of anything about the labor market,” says David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth University. “People have not understood that the labor market is not nearly as strong as people think.”

How many workers are considered discouragedAbout 321,000 individuals in September said they hadn’t looked for a job in the past four weeks because they didn’t think there was one out there for them, according to the Labor Department’s “discouraged workers” gauge in the monthly employment report.

Data, however, isn’t seasonally adjusted, so it’s more helpful to look at the statistics on a six-month or one-year average, Pollak says. Over the past year, there have been about 412,000 discouraged workers, which brings the ratio to 6.8 individuals per every 100 unemployed.

It’s not as if there hasn’t been improvement. In 2010, during the immediate aftermath of the Great Recession, the average monthly level of discouraged workers reached 1.2 million people, the highest on record. The total level has since fallen to its pre-crisis level, but it hasn’t yet reached the lows achieved during the early 2000s.

“It’s a pretty noisy series,” Pollak says, but the total level is “more than we would have expected to see.”

Why workers are still discouraged in such a strong job marketThere are a number of reasons why that’s so, with weak pay gains at the top. Workers might be discouraged that they can’t find a job that’s sustainable, says Blanchflower, whose February book “Not Working: Where Have All the Good Jobs Gone?” explored the phenomenon.

Average hourly earnings grew on an annual basis by 2.9 percent, the weakest in more than a year, according to the Labor Department’s September jobs report. It’s fallen from its peak in February, when earnings grew 3.4 percent from a year earlier.

[READ: We’re in the longest economic expansion in US history — here’s what made it unlike any other]

Economists have been puzzled about why wages haven’t picked up more, especially given that the unemployment rate is so low. Typical economic logic suggests that employers boost workers’ pay to attract more workers in a tight labor market.

Another factor could be that individuals are discouraged about how many hours they’ll get in the positions they apply for, Blanchflower says. Although total hours worked have mostly rebounded from their recession lows, 4.4 million Americans are still working part-time for economic reasons.

“The labor market isn’t offering enough adequate jobs and enough hours,” Blanchflower says. “That’s essentially what we’ve seen and why people are discouraged. They can’t find the decent, well-paying jobs that their parents and grandparents had. Even if you get a job, it’s low pay, and you can’t even get enough hours.”

Other regions of the country have been left behind. Job creation outside of major urban centers, for example, has been slow to bounce back to its pre-recession pace.

[READ: Experts vs. Americans: State of the U.S. economy]

Discouraged workers are also tricky to track. Some individuals, for example, could be in school currently because they’re discouraged about their job prospects, but they might not be counted in the gauge, Blanchflower says.

“Some are students, some of them are homemakers, some of them are retired, and some of them are permanently disabled,” Blanchflower says. “The question is, who are these discouraged workers?”

Tricky just to look at the unemployment rateAll of this illustrates that the broader unemployment rate is no longer “an adequate measure,” Blanchard says. “You need to broaden it.”

Discouraged workers are considered to be “marginally attached” to the labor force. Technically, they’re not counted as unemployed because they haven’t looked for work in the past four weeks.

Other measures of unemployment track those discouraged workers, as well as those who aren’t working but considered the prime age (or between 25 and 54) for labor. Those broader measures haven’t reached the same impressive lows as the national unemployment rate.

The broadest measure is the U6 rate, which includes the total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons. That rate currently sits at 6.9 percent, the lowest since December 2000.

“That’s still good,” says Steve DeLoach, an economics professor at Elon University who has studied how business conditions impact individuals’ job searching behavior. “It’s about consistent with where it bottomed out in the early 2000s before the 2001 recession. It’s a little bit lower than it was before the Great Recession. But one way to look at that is, unemployment isn’t as low as we think.”

Another measure tracks both total unemployed plus those discouraged workers, also known as the U4 rate. The numbers have shown immense improvement, reaching as high as 10.5 percent in April of 2010. But it took nearly seven years to return to pre-recession lows and is now 3.7 percent.

Why you’ll always have discouraged workersBut even in a historically strong labor market, there will always be discouraged workers. It’s part of the structural barriers of unemployment, DeLoach says.

[READ: Scary percentage of Americans financially unprepared for recession]

“There’s a reason we can’t go down to zero unemployment,” according to DeLoach. “There’s a group of people, even in a really strong economy, who don’t have the skills appropriate for whatever jobs are being posted.”

Sometimes, it’s more than just skills. Individuals may not have the monetary means to move where the bulk of the jobs are.

“There might not be a lot of jobs being created in their area, and they don’t have the ability to move to the big city,” DeLoach says. “It’s a question of mobility.”

If you’re feeling discouraged about your job prospects, it may be worth pursuing more education and training to build your skill sets, DeLoach says. Individuals who pursue a college degree generally make more money and have more job prospects than their counterparts who didn’t continue their education or receive a high school diploma.

“Generationally, it comes down to skills and education,” DeLoach says. “Those are pieces of the puzzle, and it takes a lot more to adjust.”



To: longnshort who wrote (1198076)2/2/2020 2:01:51 PM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Respond to of 1573857
 
OOPS! Monica Lewinsky on Trump impeachment witnesses: ‘gee … I had to give that videoed witness testimony…’
Published: Feb 1, 2020 8:54 a.m. ET
marketwatch.com
By NICOLELYN PESCE

After Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander released a statement on Thursday night saying that he will not vote to hear witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial, claiming that the commander-in-chief’s actions have been “inappropriate” but not “impeachable,” former impeachment trial witness Monica Lewinsky had this to say:

“gee, too bad i had to give that videoed witness testimony for the senate trial in the clinton impeachment. (i mean, talk about unflattering lighting and having a bad hair day.)”Monica Lewinsky

That struck a chord with Twitter TWTR, -2.23% users furious over the fact that Alexander and other Republican senators are likely to block a vote to call witnesses on Friday, meaning the president could be acquitted as early as Friday night. The hashtag #WeWantWitnessesAndDocuments had drawn about 40,000 tweets by Friday morning, while #LamarsLegacy and #LamarAlexanderIsACoward were also trending.

Lewinsky’s tweet had drawn several hundred comments and almost 30,000 likes by Friday midmorning.


Monica Lewinsky

?@MonicaLewinsky

gee, too bad i had to give that videoed witness testimony for the senate trial in the clinton impeachment. (i mean, talk about unflattering lighting and having a bad hair day.)

136K
5:43 AM - Jan 31, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy

23.8K people are talking about this

Lewinsky has been pointing out the differences between the Clinton impeachment and the Trump impeachment on her Twitter feed throughout this whole process. She tweeted “Are you f----ing kidding me?” earlier this month, which appeared to respond to former independent counsel Ken Starr being appointed to the president’s defense team. Starr and Robert Ray, another lawyer added to the team, had exposed President Bill Clinton’s sexual relationship with Lewinsky, then a White House intern, during the counselors’ five-year investigation of the Whitewater land-development deal in Arkansas in which Bill and Hillary Clinton participated. The allegations in the Starr report led to Clinton’s 1998 impeachment.

So when University of Southern California law professor Orin Kerr mused on Twitter last spring about what it would have been like if the Starr report (whose 453 pages were released in full) got the same treatment as the Mueller report (whose disputed four-page summary by Attorney General William Barr predated by several weeks the release of the redacted two-volume, 448-page Mueller report), Lewinsky responded, “if. f—ing. only.” In other words, she suggested that if the details of her private life been kept secret, she might have avoided being the subject of harassment, ridicule and abuse in the media and online since 1998.

Lewinsky has become an advocate against cyberbullying since then, as well as a public speaker on digital privacy, reputation and resilience.

But she noted in interviews last fall that the Trump impeachment has made her a “punchline” again, although she also acknowledged that this investigation and trial is a “constitutional crisis, [and] it’s much bigger than me.”



To: longnshort who wrote (1198076)2/2/2020 4:27:12 PM
From: pocotrader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573857
 
you're no fucking conservative, you are a far right wingnut wacko, so far right if the earth was flat you would have fallen off the edge long ago, the old GOP would have sent you to the loony bin where you belong