Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (4773)	1/25/1998 12:49:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

>>>The reality is that Barron's does not have to prove anything. The burden of proof, in a case like this, rests heavily on the plaintiff. <<< Nope. They filed the suit in Britain, and the burden of proof is on Barron's. They have to prove that they didn't defame Osicom, not vice versa. British libel law is opposite this country's. It's why Kitty Kelly's latest book on the royal family was not published there. If the suit was being heard in this country, you would be correct. Since is not, your entire premise is incorrect. Barb