Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Satyr who wrote (845)	1/25/1998 1:39:00 PM
From: Diane	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

As i recall Mr. Starr has been trying for 3 1/2 years while spending 30 million dolars to prove Mr. Clinton guilty of something. I don't have the exact numbers with me, but I recently read that the Iran-Contra hearings spent as much as Ken Starr has, and resulted in one indictment, which was later overturned. Starr's investigation has resulted in something like 22 indictments, many of them close associates of Clinton. And they are still finding new evidence. Keep in mind that a big reason it has gone on so long and cost so much is that Clinton and his people have been less than cooperative. Some of the subpeoned records have taken literally years for them to produce. The reason the investigation has taken so long it that there is so much to do!!!