Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: craig crawford who wrote (4781)	1/25/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: Grantcw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

Craig, I've already posed this question to you once, but I'm wondering if you are avoiding it because you have no answer. Why is the Gigamux technology not worth $4 a share to Osicom or another company acquiring FIBR? Let's forget all of the other areas of the company for now and just explain this one. It seems that The Forrester Report thinks that the Gigamux technology is worth something by their statements in a recent article... Grant

To: craig crawford who wrote (4781)	1/25/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: lisa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

Craig, heres a good point to debate, Do you think its fair when National Publications interviews Common Mobsters months before they print a negative article, Can you imagine how much this Mobster made selling his information, and short selling the stock, these guys had 20/20 vision, calling the author back adding to his story after he confers with the people he sells the information too? gees, give me a break? The only reason you can even smell of a share of Osicom stock at these prices, is because of injustices like these, NATIONAL PUBLICATION TIPPING OFF MOBSTERS USING THEIR INPUT IN NEGATIVE STORIES, I COMPARE BUISNESS WEEK AND BARRONS TO THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER!!

To: craig crawford who wrote (4781)	1/25/1998 3:11:00 PM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 10479

Law Action announcement........ I herewith announce possible law action against Mr.Craig Crawford and others. The reasoning behind is detailed at www.skymidi.com/neuro.htm I tried to make the site look good but I may have failed in some standards. The server is slow but my message is strong and will give support outside this thread to those who always wonder why and have not a clue what is happening on this chat/investing forums which influence stock trading nowadays. Besides it may warn off those habitual patronizers who have not a pot to piss into and a window to throw it out but lecture and advise. And if you do not agree your just an idiot. The natural flow of the stock was interrupted with an unlawful personal gain agenda and not a commercial one, by Mr. Craig Crawford, regardless of his word tailoring for selfprotection. Bringing foreward the argument of profit taking like Lisa did here is just annother attempt to twist and tailor the unknown while posing for attention. Thank you anyways Lisa for your interpretation about the million dollar share block I would not have known otherwise. I invite all who have witnessed the scenario on this thread and similar ones on others to distribute my site name to anyone and to all those threads inclusive Yahoo so " The Longs " can see that not everyone is buying the selfserving statements originating from " Prententious Longs " stating that if you loose out on a deal it is Your fault because you have no business in the market if you do not know how it works. Those are the worst in these forums followed by " And look at me what I made ! I bet they blush as well when they see the tax man, looking for his pound of flesh. Get off the stage I say to them. I am not waiting to be butchered..I may not succeed but at least I do something about it. Mr.Craig Crawford has worked non stop for nearly three days and nights on his agenda. For the sakes of 2000 shares? Never underestimate your enemy is my parole and when you look at the picture of Mr. Craig Crawford the way I see him, you may start thinking differently. Just one lonely wolf only exists in Hollywood. Now I go for a few beers and will return later to put some more pictures in the material. The server is free to me but slow.Sorry about that. E/Mail about spelling errors etc are most welcome. ED

To: craig crawford who wrote (4781)	1/25/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: James Strauss	Respond to of 10479

It Wouldn't Be The First Time.... >>>These publications and us "professional shorts" just picked poor little Osicom out of a hat and decided to randomly target it for no reason. Yeah, and I suppose you know who the person was on the grassy knoll as well.<<< ************************************************************** A number of years back there was a Wall Street Journal "Heard on the Street" SCANDAL, for a very similar reason... I believe the reporter was indicted for working hand in hand with Shorts to print negative articles after a select group of people took large short positions in those stocks... It happened before and it can happen again!!! As for the Grassy Knoll... We all know it was the Cigarette Man... : > Jim