SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Clarke who wrote (3096)1/26/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: Madharry  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78574
 
I have just started to look at this and right away i see that the finance receivables are about 1.7 billion vs. equity of aroung 1billion and that finance receivables doubled from 9/30/96 to 9/30/97. but sales are up 10% ON A QUARTERLY COMPARISION. It looks to me that this is a bit of a pig in the poke and that true profitability may not be determined for years. I assume these are medium term receivables. Has anyone here really looked at the finance portfolio , policies and returns chargeoffs. geographical distribution? This is speculation on my part, but I wouldn't expect to collect on my asian receivables in the near future, and brazil is a potential problem as well, and this is where the sales growth has been in 1997. call me curious.



To: James Clarke who wrote (3096)1/26/1998 12:30:00 PM
From: Michael Burry  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 78574
 
Looks like New Holland may be a way to play the next
emerging markets boom/recovery? In any case, I am having
a hard time staying out of the stock - just feel that if
I am patient I might get it even cheaper.

BTW, VO barely budged today at 33 and change despite Mario
Gabelli's table pounding in the roundtable that the stock is worth
upwards of $50-60. I guess the way he says everything is worth
10 times cash flow bothers me. Why not 6 or 7? And if 6 or 7,
then what's the upside? Maybe the market agrees.

Mike



To: James Clarke who wrote (3096)1/27/1998 8:48:00 AM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78574
 
James and Mike: re SJP. I notice a little write-up in current Forbes. Somebody estimates value at $47/sh.