Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DiViT who wrote (28749)	1/26/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: Stoctrash	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50808

Unfortunately, Me too..

To: DiViT who wrote (28749)	1/26/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: Ed's Head	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50808

David Nadalin: You bet I believe the ramifications of robt's post! like I had stated earlier, someone belongs in jail. good luck c-ya!

To: DiViT who wrote (28749)	1/26/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: robt justine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50808

David: My belief on the so called "post-conference call private calls" is that there is incredible competition amongst analysts to gauge the short term future of these companies. I cannot remember a conference call (and I've listened to many; Cube and non-Cube) where I have heard one precision-like, hard hitting, insightful question asked by an analyst. I think that they may circle around the areas of concern that they may have when asking a question in the conference call. But if there is something of major significance to the analyst's stance on the stock, then I believe that the analyst will wait for a private hearing with the company such that he can maintain the proprietary nature and authorship of his work and not end up doing the research for the conference call participants. In other words, I think that these post conference telephone calls are initiated by the analysts and not by the company. As usual, Herb has (IMHO) twisted reality to fit his motives. BTW, I thought that he never read the postings to the SI.