Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (1480)	1/26/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Remember when Bob Bennett claimed Paula Jones could not sue Slick because as Commander in Chief, he was actually covered by laws which protect the military from suits? Well, since he claims he's in the military, shouldn't he be removed for adultery at the very least? Regards

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (1480)	1/26/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: SMALL FRY	Respond to of 20981

Oh well, So many Bimbos, so little time... What I think is sad about this whole affair is the fact that, we as a the "people" have come to accept Mr Clinton's transgressions as a lighthearted peregrination of some sort... Yet,(I'm slightly biased here) we persecute the military for allegations of "Fraternization" and "Immorality". Shouldn't we at least hold our Supreme Leader to rhe same standard of conduct he himself is so quick to point? That is, when someone else is errs? I say, keel haul the man... tie the knot on (his) Willy!!!<g> SF