Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Snowshoe who wrote (154792)	3/20/2020 4:02:05 AM
From: 3bar	1 Recommendation Recommended By sense Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217620

There are tests French , small , Chinese tests that show the effectiveness of Chloroquine . Adding Azithromycin has a person cured in 3 days i believe . The French study . youtube.com

To: Snowshoe who wrote (154792)	3/20/2020 4:45:45 AM
From: Dr. Voodoo	1 Recommendation Recommended By sense Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217620

Something to consider: In 1918 if you had spanish flu, and your neighbor offered you a blood letting, or some tonic water and told you it would work to cure your dying relative,,, would you give it to them if you had no other choice? If people tried it, and it did relatively no harm,,, historically how would we view that today? If it did a little harm, but cured a few, how would we view it? If it worked? The only thing that has changed is the information flow, and our ability as humans to adapt to circumstance and change it. We are being bombarded with solutions,,, many of which will first do no harm,,, and might actually be good. The regulatory machinations that we believe are there to keep us all safe,,, because god forbid someone buy remedies that aren't effective,,,, are slowing down our ability to solve this problem in a sensible and expedient way,,,, and are quite possibly slowing down our ability to scale these medicines up at risk to save lives. We are all being asked to take a collective risk to shut our businesses, our homes, and our communities, and we are dilly dallying waiting to see if populations can be striated, effectiveness, placebos, and other bullshit. This ain't rocket science. This is medicine. We need to let the smart doctors be doctors, the scientists scientist, and keep us safe.

To: Snowshoe who wrote (154792)	3/20/2020 6:37:59 PM
From: sense	3 Recommendations Recommended By frankl Reilly Diefenbach Secret_Agent_Man Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217620

Alternate realities... Trump touts chloroquine, old malaria drug that doctors say may help treat coronavirus Oddly, no one even bothers asking the question.... why WOULD any cheap, readily available anti-malaria drug... ever work against a virus... which is not a spirochete ? No curious protein chemists out there ? But, we're told... we must defend the centralized institutional control of ideas to the last man... while millions die... waiting for the central bureaucrat first class sub-directorate of the bureau of communication... to receive the word that validates that something that works... works... even when they have nothing else that works to offer us... other than the certitude that strict compliance with their dicta is the only possible right answer ? The communication protocols controlling what is allowed to be understood as true... must be saved ? Are those claiming "it works" lying ? Is there no way to find out ? Is it far too dangerous to allow people to decide for themselves... because if left free to choose, some may die ? Does "anecdotal" mean... line up and die because we won't allow you to make a choice that may save you ? Our process is more important... and must be saved... even if you must die to save us, and what we value... that you don't ? No end to the sarcasm...