Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: username who wrote (1551)	1/26/1998 3:39:00 PM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

HEADLINE: WILLIE'S DICK A WORLDLY TOPIC - tampabayonline.net

To: username who wrote (1551)	1/26/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: Michael Sphar	Respond to of 20981

HEADLINE: NEW REPULIC EDITORS SITE PRESIDENTIAL SELF-ABUSE! ...The "I" word--impeachment--is already in the air. Absent more conclusive evidence, we're not climbing on that bandwagon. But, in a purely legal and constitutional sense, such talk is appropriate. Under the Constitution, a congressional investigation is the preferred venue for airing allegations of serious misconduct by the president--and for deciding if they warrant his removal from office. Such an investigation, although inevitably partisan, would certainly be preferable to leaving the decision to an unelected and hence unaccountable independent counsel. We, however, doubt that the Republicans would have the courage to mount such an inquiry. Why should they? Ken Starr is already quite effectively damaging the president, and the president is already quite effectively damaging himself. (Copyright 1998, The New Republic)