Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (1572)	1/26/1998 3:35:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

>>And not only that, he is also being accused of holding Ms. Lewinsky against her will for many hours. By whom? Clinton cronies only lie. Her lawyer says Monica was there of her own will. >>As for Paula Jones, her own lawyers thought her story lacks credibility! What more can I say! If they did, boy were they wrong!

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (1572)	1/26/1998 3:35:00 PM
From: Follies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Dipy you said: Perhaps a few of these characters will lose their jobs or end up in jail Finally we agree. I am assuming you are taking about the President.

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (1572)	1/26/1998 3:40:00 PM
From: loafer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

I'd say Starr has performed well so far. 20+ indictments, several jail sentences for various players. Compared with other independent council's it seems we're getting our moneys worth. Maybe it's because the people involved have actually committed crimes. What a shock! I'll say it again, he already has enough pyhsical or corrobative evidence on this particular incident, and probably others as well, that's why Monica's attorney is freaking out trying to get her immunity. I think the system is working pretty well.