Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (9033)	4/6/2020 11:12:51 AM
From: Winfastorlose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26513

It is not a joking matter. Anyone who has bothered to read the literature from the council on foreign relations (from which most of our political candidates come) over the past 35 years is well aware of the plans for "a world without borders and a centralized government". Why do you think Pelosi stood on the Southern Border a couple of years ago and referred to it as "an artificial border"? You may be well schooled and learned in the computer sciences but insofar as your political knowledge goes, it is incomplete. There is much for you to discover if you want to take the time.

To: Kirk © who wrote (9033)	4/6/2020 11:29:09 AM
From: Winfastorlose	Respond to of 26513

Something to keep in mind when attempting to analyze political events is that the "facts" are not straightforward as they are in your field. Politics are full of propaganda and subterfuge. There is rarely much hard truth that one can easily grasp. You have to take information that surrounds the official line to even get close to the reality. A little bit like the official lines on the stock market, which is very political. When I was in University, one of the first books we were required to read in political theory was Machiavelli's "The Prince". You have probably heard of the idea that in politics, "the end justifies the means". It is the philosophy of many politicians.