To: Return to Sender who wrote (9223 ) 2/26/2021 4:53:37 PM From: Kirk © Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26518 Does this mean we'll have to find new names for "trade regulations" just like we're not allowed to call people here in California "illegal aliens" when they break the law? Does "won’t enforce the rule aggressively " mean the government is back to the highest bidder or those who do the most climate change or hire the most "woke" workers? What does it mean? U.S. to Impose Sweeping Rule Aimed at China Technology Threats Biden administration plans to let the Trump-era rule on technology purchases and deals take effect, despite U.S. business objections about its scope WASHINGTON—The Biden administration plans to allow a sweeping Trump-era rule aimed at combating Chinese technology threats to take effect next month, over objections from U.S. businesses, according to people familiar with the matter. The rule, initially proposed in November, enables the Commerce Department to ban technology-related business transactions that it determines pose a national-security threat, part of an effort to secure U.S. supply chains. Companies in technology, telecommunications, finance and other industries say the rule could stifle innovation and hurt competitiveness, and had expected it to be delayed as the administration undertakes a broad review of U.S. policy on Chinese technology. Now the administration is planning to go forward with the rule, the people said. Administration officials are concerned that blocking or diluting the rule would send the wrong message about the new administration’s approach to China, potentially fueling criticism that it is taking a weaker approach, according to the people. One person familiar with the matter said administration officials have signaled to the business community that they won’t enforce the rule aggressively. That could soften the impact, although business representatives say the rule will still subject firms—especially smaller ones—to significant new compliance costs and uncertainty. Another person familiar with the matter said the administration hasn’t said it would hold back in enforcing the rule. The rule is “unworkable for U.S. businesses in its current form and should not be considered for final publication without significant revisions,” said The Business Roundtable, a group of CEOs of major companies, in a comment filed with the Commerce Department in January. A Commerce Department spokesperson said the agency continues to accept public comment on the rule through March 22, adding that the rule becomes final then. “Trustworthy information and communications technology and services are essential to our national and economic security and remain a top priority for the Biden/Harris administration,” the spokesperson said. The White House didn’t respond to requests for comment. The rule could affect millions of American businesses, according to a Commerce Department estimate, potentially requiring them to get government clearance for purchases and deals involving sophisticated technology with what the regulation calls a “foreign adversary,” or face potential unwinding of the deals or other enforcement. The rule’s fate is being closely watched as a bellwether of the Biden administration’s policy direction on China. Washington has seen a solidifying consensus about the security and economic risks posed by Chinese tech equipment manufacturers and internet platforms. Republicans in Congress have grilled Biden cabinet nominees about taking a tough line on China. Allowing the rule to go ahead could signal further trouble for U.S. businesses, which find themselves increasingly caught in the middle of Washington’s effort to confront China over its economic policies and Beijing’s retaliation for the U.S. moves. ...Dozens of business groups, including several leading tech groups, have filed comments urging the administration to scale back or postpone the rule. “We view the proposed rule as vague and highly problematic because as written, it would provide the department with nearly unlimited authority to intervene in virtually any commercial transaction between U.S. companies and their foreign counterparts that involves technology, with little to no due process, accountability, transparency, or coordination with other government programs that are also designed to protect national security,” one group of more than 30 business associations wrote in a letter in mid-January, just before President Biden took office. That group included major tech and foreign-trade associations as well as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, retailers, restaurants and electric utilities.The new government oversight would apply to technology transactions involving critical U.S. infrastructure, networks and satellite operations, large data hosting operations, widely used internet connectivity software, and technology used in advanced computing, drones, autonomous systems or advanced robotics, according to the draft rule. It could impact sales or, in some circumstances, use of a technology. The telecommunications and financial-services industries are viewed as particularly affected by the rule because they are heavy users of information-technology services and handle sensitive consumer data, but many other consumer-facing businesses also have a lot at stake.As many as 4.5 million firms of all sizes could be impacted by the rule, and t otal compliance costs could reach as much as $52 billion in the first year after implementation, the Commerce Department estimated recently, with annualized costs of as much as $20 billion . More at https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-to-impose-sweeping-rule-aimed-at-china-technology-threats-11614362435?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Anews%7Csection%3Amain_content%7Cbutton%3Abody_link