SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (9245)4/19/2020 11:47:05 AM
From: Kirk ©2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Lee Lichterman III
Winfastorlose

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26669
 
This appears to be a major failure of the PPP and I'm pretty sure the news reporters still haven't figured out it is the low cost of FAILING to keep workers employed is why so many large companies take the money and still lay off workers.

buzzfeednews.com

Under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), the government will forgive the loans if the money is used on payroll, rent, or utilities — and workers aren't laid off.
All loans were from JP Morgan bank but will be backed by the US government as part of the $2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act. The act provided up to $350 billion in loans to businesses with 500 employees or less for payroll purposes.

But the law provided some flexibility to restaurant and hotel groups by stating they could apply as long as they had no more than 500 workers at a single location.

Under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), the government will forgive the loans if the money is used on payroll, rent, or utilities — and workers aren't laid off.
...
A Ruth's spokesperson told BuzzFeed News the company took the loans to provide additional liquidity. "As a franchised organization, it is our responsibility to our nearly 30 small business owners, team members, customers and shareholders, to do everything we can to ensure Ruth’s Hospitality Group is well positioned to emerge from this situation a strong and viable entity," the spokesperson said.
...
"They have lines of credit and other available loans and they can work with their bank," she said.
I added this comment:
Kirk Lindstrom
I believe the article neglected to say these loans come at a very low interest rate so the big corporate restaurants can still lay off workers where they are not forgiven and then repay these loans at a much lower interest rate than their current lines of credit. I believe the solution is to raise the interest rate
I have two close friends with women owned small businesses who tried to get these loans to pay their tiny staffs... and they were pushed aside by the big, corporate restaurants and VC backed companies that have bigger business dealings with the banks so of course they got first dibs at the money. Getting a huge sum at 1.0% interest that you could split between banks paying 1.6% to 2.0% in CDs for liquidity would mean some of these bigger companies can make money, lay off workers and crowd out the small businesses this money was intended for.



I wish the news and politicians would figure this out and end the loophole. Charge a 10% fee plus 5% a year interest rate if anyone with over 30 employees takes these PPP loans to raise capital and doesn't keep EVERY worker.