Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Microsoft - The Evil empire -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: K. M. Strickler who wrote (633)	1/27/1998 12:25:00 PM
From: Kal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1600

I 'was and stopped using' NT 4.0, I don't remember which service pack was installed. win95 is far better than 3.1. I almost like. And I prefer it over NT, maybe simply becuase it is less complex and I can handle/resolve more of its crashes/freezes (and a healthy percentage of times just reset-button it) I miss my HP workstation.

To: K. M. Strickler who wrote (633)	1/28/1998 12:05:00 AM
From: Schiz	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1600

Yes W95 is DEFINATELY not as stable as it shoud be, but it is BETTER than W3.0! How much money am I going to have to spend on perpetual upgrades until I can get a sytem that is &#@&ing reliable? I recently bought a new computer with the latest version of w95 and it crashes just as often as my last computer. I haven't had to re-install windows because it crashed every time it recognized my new modem like my old system did but I haven't upgraded my modem in the new system. Why does microsuck have to "integrate" all these new "features" into the os? Why don't they concentrate on making the existing os $^&*ing reliable. Billy boy says the doj wants them to sell a crippled product. What a jerk. They have been selling a crippled product for last last 10 years. Just my opinions.