SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: starpopper who wrote (2174)1/27/1998 1:05:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 20981
 
You could not be more wrong! Clinton gets and deserves no credit. He walked into it.

The Dem tax increase Bush embraced is better viewed as the cause of the ensuing recession. The overall boom we are seeing is a continuation of the Reagan Boom that Bush abated for a short period.

Just as Clinton's 1993 increase slowed the economy from what it would have done without the tax increase. It's still the Reagan boom. Only now we have the Reagan Peace Dividend balancing the budget. Leave it to Reagan to end the predicament (Cold War) FDR left us with - $7 trillion spent on FDR's miscalculations

Tax increases are fiscal drags not boons.

As liberal historian Richard Rovere recently said (before the scandal, on Clinton's legacy) on CBS, "Clinton will be remembered as a small acorn hanging on that mightly oak called Reagan".



To: starpopper who wrote (2174)1/27/1998 1:11:00 PM
From: Russian Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Do you honestly mean to intimate that taxes are good for us, from an economic point of view? (I am sure, by the way, that Mr. Clinton and his ilk would agree with you.)

Silly me, I always thought just the oposite. Somehow, I also got the erroneous idea that, if the country is running a chronic deficit, it must be spending irresponsibly.

Guess I was wrong, huh?

RB