Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BlueCrab who wrote (2931)	1/28/1998 12:22:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

Wrong. No stretch - it's the law. Yes. Don't know. They did.

To: BlueCrab who wrote (2931)	1/28/1998 12:58:00 PM
From: Follies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

So it's OK to participate in illegal acts in Maryland as long as you say you "didn't know" they were illegal? Now that's a stretch; This is true according to the Maryland State Attorney General, at least as it applies to recording conversations when only one of the parties is aware it is being recorded. Get your facts right.

To: BlueCrab who wrote (2931)	1/28/1998 1:12:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 20981

Tripp "had to know" that what she did was illegal? So it's OK to participate in illegal acts in Maryland as long as you say you "didn't know" they were illegal? Actually that IS true. But how can one prove Tripp did or didn't know? Most of us are aware that it's illegal to tape phone conversations without the other party's consent in some states but not in others. Seems reasonable to imagine that Tripp might have informed herself on that point. Last I heard the Maryland D.A. said no decision would be made on possible wiretapping charges until Starr had finished with Tripp.