To: MangoBoy who wrote (3587 ) 1/29/1998 5:06:00 AM From: Roger Bass Respond to of 12468
I kind of agree both with you, and the other responses. I do think that the information services business is somewhat complementary to the broadband comms business, in that it creates demand for the bandwidth and (inversely), broadband customers are the right market for targetting broadband services at (obviously!) I think it will be some time (a year or two) before the internet backbone gets to the point that broadband services from any site on the net will work as well as services provided by the provider who delivers the broadband local loop. I also agree that it is likely to account for an increasing proportion of sales and However, if they went as far as getting a separate quotation for the new media business, it could help the valuation in being easier for the Street to value, and by making the businesses more separable for a pure-telecoms acquirer, say. (That said, I'd be surprised to see that happen any time soon). BTW: on the broadband service/bandwidth linkup, I've been idly wondering whether @Home or anyone else has a chance of getting some scale in creating the infrastructure for delivering broadband services more widely, independently of any questions about whether wireless, ADSL or cable modems win. (@Home is 70% owned by TCI, so unless the rumoured $1bn AT&T investment happens, they may be staying focused on cable only). With players like Winstar New Media, Source Media (one of WCII's partners) and @Home, it seems to me that the broadband online services market is kind of where online services were 3-5 years ago : ie relatively vertically integrated. Interesting to think about who will win as this evolves towards an open, broadband internet and broadband service content publishers & concentrators.