SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jhild who wrote (3148)1/28/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 20981
 
The elements of authority and control are very much against him. Again, you really just don't get it....it's pointless to argue the so called merits of a potential sexual harassment case with you. The one point you cannot dispute, is that if the Clinton behaved as alleged, his behaviour set himself up for a sexual harassment suit against a sitting President of the United States. That is the only relevant issue, end of story.



To: jhild who wrote (3148)1/28/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
>>If you would open the door to the removal of a President on such a thin clam, then we would be setting an incredible precedent for the future<<

Uh, I think the Supreme Court voted 9 zip on this point. You forgetting about that little Paula Corbin Jones case making it's way down the track? Jhild, you seem to be in denial....