Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (3287)	1/29/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: loafer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Janice, do you have any idea how easy it is to lift fingerprints off of documents and compare them? DNA is just icing on the cake. Read my earlier posts. You heard it here first.

To: Janice Shell who wrote (3287)	1/29/1998 11:38:00 AM
From: Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

I heard there is no such dress, that in fact they took a pant suit from her home. I do believe ML's lawyer was attibuted with comments saying he knows of no such dress. One thing people tend to forget. ML never asked for any of this. She made some comments to a friend(?). Those words were said in confidence. She never had any intention for those words to become public. If she was lying when she said them, God only knows her motivation. Could be to incite jealousy among peers, who knows, who cares. BTW Duncan, 2 points...facts are not disputable,am I not correct here? 2) Clinton or any one for that matter, would be vey busy if he tried to dispell every accusation hurled his way. Why dignify such ludicrise (sp?) insinuations with a comment, which would surely only be fodder for more BS. He would only be accused of trying to obscure the facts anyway. The truth will unfold, and the players shown for what they truly are, he need not participate in the mudslinging. As a matter of fact, he has said all he needs to say, "I did not have sexual relations with this woman". Nothing unclear in there for me. I hope you respond reasonably to this, and not take my words out of context. I as you, know nothing in certainty either, but I'm willing to admit it. Regards Frank