SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jules V who wrote (46695)1/29/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jules - Re: "What do you make of this: Cyrix's MediaGX..."

In one year, ONE mainline PC manufacturer - Compaq - has signed on with the MediaGX.

Where is the groundswell of support except for this and a bunch of cheap MediaGX motherboards from Taiwan?

Cyrix has lost money on this approach - they will continue to lose money as they add more features and increase their costs.

When you read this Cyrix-Killer B.S. day in and day out in the media press, then read Cyrix's quarterly reports, you have to wake up and do a reality check!

Cyrix is losing money and besides Compaq, nobody with a reputable brand name is using their product. Even IBM has dropped Cyrix - and IBM does the Fab work for Cyrix! Some endorsement!

Reality speaks for itself - the technical media press puts their spin on things because they dislike runaway success. They think they can appeal to the populous by trumpeting the "David Beats Goliath" story day after day after day after day after day.

David may have beaten Goliath (that's old news) but Intel makes a helluva lot of money and Cyrix loses a helluva lot of money.

Period.

Paul



To: Jules V who wrote (46695)1/29/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 186894
 
Jules,
RE: "To: Paul Engel (46695 )
From: Jules V
Thursday, Jan 29 1998 12:25PM EST
Reply # of 46714

What do you make of this:

byte.com

When Cyrix began shipping the MediaGX in late 1996, the core speed
was 133 MHz. Since then, Cyrix has introduced versions that run at 150
and 166 MHz, with a 200-MHz chip due soon. These cores don't
support MMX and have relatively poor floating-point performance, but
they can match or beat the Pentium when running common
integer-intensive applications. "

First of all the 200 Mhz MediaGx and beyond does support MMX instructions.
Secondly, the MXi is why I hold NSM...just in case.
Jim