Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diogeron who wrote (3330)	1/29/1998 12:33:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

Archibald Cox was Nixon's Special Prosecutor. He Chaired JFK1's 1960 campaign against Nixon. That's partisan Starr is a political innocent in comparison.

To: Diogeron who wrote (3330)	1/29/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Yes, Diogeron, I agree that the public will probably side with Clinton over Ken Starr until there is hard evidence corroborating the tryst. But what then? I suspect they may still discount it, and not even care that Clinton directly lied to them, after asking them to trust him. However, I think the public is so wishy washy that they study hard news for about two minutes a day at most, and that is my primary concern. Mrs. Clinton just mentioning a conspiracy which seems to include the entire mainstream press was enough to send opinion off in a different direction. I am worried that it is SO easy to spin public opinion. Her argument is irrational at best. I didn't hear the stuff about Starr, but I did hear this morning that two aides have testified, apparently, that Clinton met with Lewinsky late last month, to coach her on her testimony apparently.