SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank who wrote (3380)1/29/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Frank, frank, frank....we've been through this before. Everything thus far is speculation. I'm making my case on the assumptionof certain facts. Please don't tell me I have to preface each and every post with if the facts are proven as alleged.....I agree with Janice though, unless there is irrefutable physical evidence this argument will go on forever like the Simpson case. You'll have a percentage of people who believe he did it and those who say he didn't and nobody is ever going to be convinced otherwise. Sad for the country....



To: Frank who wrote (3380)1/29/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 20981
 
>>Duncan, I coud have sworn a fact was just that. Undeniable, accepted as truth by all concerned, no ambiguity, as in "scientific fact". Conclusive, indisputable, but THAT is just my opinion.

Facts, in a legal sense, are decided in court.

Scientific facts are often proven wrong - Newton. But then those weren't facts according to you.

Your argument is circular.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News