SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (162678)9/17/2020 6:21:04 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217975
 
Re <<21.17 for a November 2020 800 call????>>

It is possible for the stock to hit 800 by 20th November
because we are to understand that the call option buyers can simply treat the call options as if they are shares and in the hundreds of thousands bid successively up by 0.05 cents, until such state that the underlying shares are automatically bid up in however minute volume to 800 per share

would be amazing

but amazing always comes at immediately before the end

'they' can get Tesla to 20,000.

the issue is how fast for how long at what volume to sold to whom by who, etc etc

marketwatch.com

Unusual Tesla Option Trades Pushing Stock Higher And Higher

Published: Aug. 20, 2020 at 12:31 p.m. ET

By Wayne Duggan

Tesla Inc TSLA, -1.77% once again traded sharply higher by 6.2% on Thursday, briefly touching the $2,000 level, despite no major news from the company.

Tesla shares are now up 77% in the past year as the company has made a profit in four straight quarters, and some say strange option trading activity could be driving the recent gains.

The Trades: On Thursday, Tesla’s sharp intraday rise coincided with large trading volume in some significantly out-of-the-money Tesla call options expiring on Friday.

“Actually... someone is buying a LOT of 8/21 $2,100 call options,” GLJ Research founder Gordon Johnson told Benzinga. “This has been going on a LOT (i.e., someone buying way out of the money short-dated call options, which forces the person writing these options to buy stock), which has pushed the stock up consistently.”

On Thursday morning, there were 55,616 contracts worth of volume in Tesla $2,000 call options expiring Friday and 22,892 contracts worth of volume on Friday $2,100 call options. The $2,000 strike price contracts and the $2,100 contracts have open interests of 14,798 and 5,091, respectively.

Upward Spiral: Stanphyl Capital Partners portfolio manager and Tesla short seller Mark Spiegel has also recently noticed the strange trading activity in the Tesla option market.

“Some entity — I don’t know who — was executing a strategy of buying massive quantities of out-of-the-money call options,” Spiegel said of Tesla’s huge run in 2020.

This strategy forced call option sellers to buy Tesla shares to cover their positions, according to Spiegel.

“This thing just kind of spiraled its way up,” he said.

Benzinga’s Take: There are plenty of explanations for Tesla’s insane run in 2020, including strange option trading, short squeezes, profits from regulatory credit sales, a spike in inexperienced Rbinhood retail traders and the stock's inclusion in the S&P 500. However, the ultimate metrics that will define Tesla’s success or failure in the long-term are auto sales and earnings growth.

Related Links:

Wedbush Raises Tesla Price Target To $1,900, Calls China A 'Paradigm Changer'

BofA Upgrades Tesla, Doubles Price Target; Says Growth Story Could 'Carry The Day'

© 2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.



To: carranza2 who wrote (162678)9/17/2020 8:24:59 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217975
 
Re TSLA

What the professor Bradford Cornell author of below article fails to realize is that w/ enough leverage, TSLA can be jacked up to a trillion.

In the meantime I am glad last trading session I positioned to lock-in profit even as I retain flexibility to either go long or short depending on whatever Message 32935752
Decided to completely hedge my winnings on the long calls by shorting still more calls 20 November strike 800, so that for each dollar the long calls lose from here on out should be balanced w/ a dollar of gains on the short calls, at expiration time, the come to god moment, otherwise known as final exam time, November 20th
Should the beast continue to rise, I can decide to decouple the hedged position, take immediate profit on the long and leave the short to decay over time, or

Should the monster decline, i do not actually lose money, as the long calls decline would be matched by the short calls gain, [within reason].

Green for long, and red for short. Events can get interesting this trading session. May have to either exit long or increase long, depending on when i wake up and how I feel when wake up.

I continue to feel positive on Battery Day, but do not really like the macro backdrop of Team USA election, whilst excited by the leverage-enhanced compression of time-to-result / acceleration-to-outcome, and the resultant volatility.

The portfolio is sitting at all-time-high watermark, and should go higher.



zerohedge.com

What Does It Take To Be Worth $500 Billion?

On August 31st Tesla‘s latest bull run ended when the stock closed at an all-time of $498.50 per share. At that price, the market cap value of Tesla was $464 billion, an amount greater than Ford, GM, Daimler, Volkswagen, and former number one Toyota put together. With Tesla approaching $500 billion, a level reached by only a handful of companies most notably today’s tech giants, Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Microsoft, we at Cornell Capital Group thought it would be a good time to examine what is required to be a $500 billion market cap company. Before investors conclude that Tesla is a $500 billion company, they should consider what the tech giants looked like when they reached that level.

The Tesla/Apple ComparisonThe most common justification for Tesla’s high valuation is the “Tesla is a tech company, not a car company” story. A key element of that story is the Tesla/Apple comparison, a favorite amongst Tesla bulls, who point to the size of the global cell phone market before the iPhone as evidence of Tesla’s massive growth potential. In the Tesla/Apple analogy, legacy auto companies play the part of Nokia, Blackberry and Motorola while Tesla is the iPhone maker. Extending the analogy further, Tesla's Model 3, like the iPhone, is supposed to be the product that redefines the industry by convincing car buyers to pay more for a technologically advanced car in the same way Apple took what appeared to be an expensive niche item and gave it mass market appeal.

Apple was also able to cash in on the iPhone's popularity by creating a new high margin market for apps and digital downloads via iTunes something Tesla hopes to emulate by selling Full Self Driving (FSD) and eventually a rideshare service via autonomous robotaxis. Unfortunately, unlike Apple who profited immediately from digital sales, Tesla has been slow to roll out the new features as promised.

Comparing Tesla with Apple when it hit the $500 billion dollar level demonstrates that Apple got to $500 billion by selling smart phones while Tesla reached that level primarily by selling a story. On February 29th, 2012, Apple, already the most valuable company in the US, achieved a market cap of $500 billion for the first time following a record quarter of earnings and revenue driven by its wildly popular iPhone 4. In the three quarters before and one quarter after reaching the $500 billion mark, Apple’s revenue was $142 billion with income of $38 billion.

If Tesla hit the $500 billion mark this year it will have been achieved the goal with revenue of $30 billion and earnings of less than $1 billion, much of that from subsidies. The table below shows that other big tech giants all had significant revenue and earnings when they reached the $500 billion mark. Amazon, which had the lowest income, had the most revenue as well as a record of consistent revenue growth. Facebook had the lowest revenue, comparable to Tesla’s, but had far larger earnings.



How Did Tesla Hit $500 Billion?How did Tesla hit $500 billion with such low income and revenue? In addition to a compelling story, Tesla was able to reverse its long history of quarterly losses and for the first time this year post four consecutive quarters of positive earnings. When Tesla announced what was the first of their four consecutive profitable quarters in October of 2019, the stock jumped, pushing Tesla’s market cap from $45 to $55 billion.

Three profitable quarters later, Tesla’s value had grown 10 times to $460 billion. Apple first hit $50 billion back in June of 2006, six months before Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone and a full year before the iPhone went on sale. Apple went on to produce 19 consecutive highly profitable quarters, earning an aggregate $80 billion, before reaching a market capitalization of $500 billion in February of 2012. At that time Apple was not only the largest public company by market cap it was also far and away the most profitable.

Tesla on the other hand was able to grow from $45 to $460 billion in only 4 quarters, earning just $368 million of net income, roughly one 1/200th of what Apple earned. Unlike Apple, the result of Tesla releasing its breakthrough mass market product, the Model 3 in July 2017, was a $3.4 billion dollar loss over the next 8 quarters.

Microsoft's journey to becoming a $500 billion company was different than the other four tech giants. Microsoft eclipsed the $500 billion mark for the first time in July of 1999. At that time, it had an annual revenue of $23 billion and income of $9.4 billion. However, even during the dot com frenzy its revenue and earnings were larger than Tesla’s. When the tech bubble burst in March of 2000, Microsoft fell below $500 billion, a level to which it would not return for another 17 years.

The Microsoft/Cisco Comparison Microsoft investors who realized no capital appreciation for 17 years would have done worse had they invested in Cisco, the other member of the dot com era $500 billion club. Cisco, the biggest maker of networking infrastructure and hardware, reached $500 billion market capitalization with even lower income and revenue numbers than Microsoft. Perhaps for that reason, Cisco's fall was even more dramatic than its rise. The stock fell 80% less than a year after hitting its all-time high in March 2000. Investors who bought Cisco and Microsoft at the height of the dot com bubble because they expected earnings and revenue growth turned out to be right.

Twenty years later and both Microsoft and Cisco are both producing much higher revenue and earnings than during the height of the dot com bubble. Today Cisco accounts for 55% of the global enterprise network market and 80% of the global network hardware market and a market cap of $170 billion, well below the $500 billion mark.

Unlike Cisco, Microsoft was able to claw its way back to $500 billion by 2017. When Microsoft returned to $500 billion, 17 years removed from dot com boom, it had much stronger fundamentals. In 2017, Microsoft’s revenues were $96.6 and net income was $25.5 billion compared to revenue and net income of $73.3 and $16.1 billion the first time the market cap hit $500 billion. The table below shows that Apple and Facebook also went multiple years between their first and last times they reached the $500 billion mark. Also, like Microsoft, the market required significantly stronger fundamentals to justify that valuation the second time around.



Tesla enthusiasts point to the historical growth of today’s big tech stocks as evidence of Tesla’s potential to grow beyond the $500 billion mark. But if so, it will eventually have to show that it can produce revenues and earnings consistent with that valuation. Fortunately for Apple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Facebook investors, as the as growth began to level off these companies already an established history of strong earnings sufficient to justify their valuations. For Tesla, reaching $500 billion based on a great story without corresponding earnings suggests that when the growth story ends there will nothing fundamental to break the fall. If Tesla falls from grace, it might be twenty years before it approaches the $500 billion mark again.

By Prof. Bradford Cornell

Sent from my iPad



To: carranza2 who wrote (162678)9/18/2020 10:29:03 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217975
 
Re << I wouldn't pay two bits for it >>

Like BitCoins, the beauty of TSLA calls of any flavour in eyes of beholder.

Last night before midnight I paid up for more TSLA calls because I thought that under the circumstances of everything is worth something, who can know what number TSLA be worth next week, Monday through Friday, when history either booms or kabooms before Battery Day, and after Battery Day. Whatever the case, should be interesting.



Also bought some puts on the market indices, to fidget-fidget, couldn’t help it.

My mom who has the right but not the obligation to vote in the upcoming Team USA election, and who had voted for both Clintons, shall vote for Trump should the election be held today / yesterday, because she (i) does not believe Biden is fit, and (ii) Trump, for better or worse, does stuff, per come to the fork of any road, he takes it.

Should such sentiment be pervasive and I cannot tell if it is, then Trump wins on Election Day, and then be contested by mail-ins from everywhere until whenever, which might be good for the trade, or not. Anyways, fidget-fidget ...



My TSLA position has now evolved to below ...

This morning the portfolio showed a tolerable loss by mark-to-market, as the long calls went up (gained), and short calls also went up (lost). Overall, the notional value of long vs short is enormous vs 4X enormous, and the actual value is 1:1, and should all go to zero in a flash, long and short, then i recognize a profit 27% of what I would have made had I left well-enough alone instead of buying the above cited calls (committing profits to make profit.

Of course, should I get rid of my long TSLA calls this instant and allow the short calls to vaporize on my counter-parties, then I earn 7X of my current secure-gain.

What I hope to do is to sell into any euphoric phase (say TSLA at 550? Pre-split 2,750) that might follow Battery Day, and do better than 7X current secure-gain, to possibly 25X current secure-gain, and if so, whoa! All on-margin and cash-neutral (given total cash spent on calls = total premiums collected during the built-up of the trade), enabling prospective increase of gold hoarding by +40%.

Addicting, intoxicating, orgasmic, and be a trade for the books. Critical that I exit the long calls at proper time, when it still has value, ideally at the peak, of course, before gravity of time-decay takes hold, and better if time to November expiration is short, so that am not exposed too much on the short side, allowing it to blow up on counter-parties in shorter order. All tricky.

Note, the earliest trades that resulted in the below order of battle was made 3rd September 2020 and progressively evolved to what be now marked to market. Red be short and green be long.



Here is something about something to do w/ Goldman Sachs and TSLA, and no, I am unsure who I am ripping the faces off of, whether GS is helping or hurting. I think GS is helping, via agitation. Softbank was helping via seed funding.

Bull-Call-spread defined investopedia.com , and my trade is a variation particular to the way I do cloud-ATM extraction

According to the report, in a time when single stock option volumes exploded 3x in the second quarter compared to the same period last year, the surge in Tesla option volumes was even more remarkable - $1.45 trillion in July, up more than 10x from $124 billion in July of last year. Amazon was the "second largest beneficiary" of the options trading, Reuters notes, seeing activity rise from $632 billion to $1.48 trillion over the same period.

zerohedge.com

Goldman Made $100 Million Trading Tesla Options, Converts In Recent Months

Over the past 6 months, special attention has been paid to Tesla and - more specifically - euphoric call-buying in the name that undoubtedly helped propel a gamma squeeze that has seen Tesla's equity scorch higher since the beginning of the year (something we discussed first in May in " Are Mysterious Call Option Purchases Forcing Tesla Stock Higher?").

Weeks ago we learned that Softbank was helping along the broader market rally with a strategy of buying OTM call spreads in a handful of high beta tech stocks - a strategy that netted Softbank upwards of $4 billion.

Goldman CEO DJ-Sol


Now it appears as though Goldman Sachs may be cashing in on a similar strategy.

According to IFR Reuters, the investment bank made about $100 million trading Tesla alone over the last several months. The bank was engaged in trades that included "stock options, providing financing secured against Tesla’s shares, and buying and selling its convertible bonds," according to Bloomberg.

Goldman's equity trading desk doesn't deal with retail investors. But the sizeable revenues it raked in show how the investment bank's traders still managed to profit from these extraordinary market moves, in part through using derivatives to position for an upswing in Tesla shares, sources said.

In addition to making buck in Tesla calls, the vampire squid also made it rain buying and selling Tesla converts (which have a face value of over US$4bn), whose prices climbed sharply this summer as the company's shares rocketed. Goldman bankers also made money providing financing secured against shares in the company, or as it is also known, "corporate equity derivatives deals" involving Tesla. That is an umbrella term for a range of transactions – including margin loans, or lending money against a company's shares – which usually involve providing financing against large equity stakes, IFR reported.

The action from Softbank acted as a "tailwind" for the company - and ultimately for Goldman, as well - as option missiles fired across the tech sector helped the broader market rise before the NASDAQ dropped about 12% from highs earlier this month.

According to the report, in a time when single stock option volumes exploded 3x in the second quarter compared to the same period last year, the surge in Tesla option volumes was even more remarkable - $1.45 trillion in July, up more than 10x from $124 billion in July of last year. Amazon was the "second largest beneficiary" of the options trading, Reuters notes, seeing activity rise from $632 billion to $1.48 trillion over the same period.



These imbalances occurred over the summer, where volume is notoriously low in equity markets. In simple terms, as best as we can understand: major financial institutions seem to be undertaking equity manipulation via the reflexivity of options market (where the tail literally wags the dog) as an actual trading strategy now.

Call us old fashioned, but whatever happened to the good old days of banks simply trading on material non-public information?